|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 352-355
Complete Uterine Septum with Cervical Duplication and Longitudinal Vaginal Septum: An Anomaly Supporting Alternative Embryological Development
Arpita De1, Abhinav Jain2, Reva Tripathi1, Aruna Nigam1
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hamdard Institute of Medical Science and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Radiology, Hamdard Institute of Medical Science and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||16-Jan-2020|
|Date of Decision||28-Feb-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||15-Oct-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||28-Dec-2020|
Dr. Aruna Nigam
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hamdard Institute of Medical Science and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
The diagnosis and management of Mullerian abnormalities have revolutionized with the advent of magnetic resonance imaging, three-dimensional ultrasound, and endoscopic techniques. All the earlier unclassified abnormalities can now be classified as per the new European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2013 nomenclature. The presence of complete uterine septum with cervical duplication and longitudinal vaginal septum reinforces the alternative theory of Mullerian development. The presence of this complex anomaly is discussed in the light of embryonic development along with management issues.
Keywords: Embryology, laparoscopy, Mullerian duct
|How to cite this article:|
De A, Jain A, Tripathi R, Nigam A. Complete Uterine Septum with Cervical Duplication and Longitudinal Vaginal Septum: An Anomaly Supporting Alternative Embryological Development. J Hum Reprod Sci 2020;13:352-5
|How to cite this URL:|
De A, Jain A, Tripathi R, Nigam A. Complete Uterine Septum with Cervical Duplication and Longitudinal Vaginal Septum: An Anomaly Supporting Alternative Embryological Development. J Hum Reprod Sci [serial online] 2020 [cited 2022 Jan 21];13:352-5. Available from: https://www.jhrsonline.org/text.asp?2020/13/4/352/305114
| Introduction|| |
Mullerian abnormalities are rare and have a varied incidence of 1%–6%. The earlier diagnosis was based on clinical, sonographic images, and during laparoscopy or laparotomy. With the availability of good three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound machines, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), laparoscopy, and hysteroscopy, the diagnosis of Mullerian abnormalities has revolutionized. This is a very rare case of the complete uterine septum with a double cervix with vaginal septum. As per the earlier used American Fertility Society (AFS) classification, this case is one of the examples which falls in the unclassified group. However, as per the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) 2013, all such anomalies can be clearly classified [Table 1]. They also challenge the unidirectional development theory and support the bidirectional development theory. Only a few such cases have been reported so far. This case highlights that management guidelines are not clear and surgical management has to be tailor made as per the clinical requirements.
| Case Report|| |
A 32-year-old nulliparous married woman presents with complaints of chronic lower abdomen pain, dyspareunia, and infertility. Her general physical examination was normal with body mass index of 22 kg/m2. On speculum examination, a longitudinal vaginal septum was seen in the proximal portion of the vagina and the cervix was partially seen beyond the septum, at a high up position [Figure 1]. On vaginal examination, a single cervix was felt high up, slightly deviated to the right, and a normal anteverted uterus. An ultrasound showed a subseptate uterus with midline thick muscular septum and normal adnexa. MRI revealed septate uterus with septa extending till the cervix [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. No anomaly was found in any other organ.
|Figure 2: Magnetic resonance imaging (axial view) showing two uterine cavities extending till cervix with single fundus|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Magnetic resonance imaging (coronal view) showing two uterine cavities|
Click here to view
To complete the diagnosis, consent was taken for vaginal septum removal, followed by diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy. The couple was given the option of septoplasty in the same sitting or later in case of pregnancy complications. They chose to have it later.
Under anesthesia, the vaginal septum was held in between two alles forceps and divided in between the two with cautery. After the septum was removed, two dimples were seen high up in the vagina. They were double cervix confirmed by magnification with the hysteroscope. Two separate sounds could be inserted through the two cervices, ruling out any cervical atresia [Figure 4]. The uterocervical length in both sides was 3.5 inches. Hysteroscope was introduced through both the cervices. The septum was found to be complete till the level of the cervix delineating two separate cervical canals and two cavities. Cavities on both sides of the septum were found to be similar in size. The two ostia were visualized on the respective sides of the uterus. On introducing the laparoscope, the fundus was found to be smooth with a 2 cm fundal midline fibroid and with normal tubes and ovaries [Figure 5]. Thus, a diagnosis of complete uterine septum with two cervices and longitudinal vaginal septum was made. On chromopertubation spill was seen on both sides.
|Figure 4: Peroperative view of double cervices with sound in each uterine cavity|
Click here to view
|Figure 5: Laparoscopic view of the single fundus with small anterior fibroid|
Click here to view
After 6 weeks of the vaginal septum resection, she reported an improvement in the dyspareunia and the heaviness in the lower abdomen [Figure 6]. She is being kept under follow-up to look for pregnancy complications and manage accordingly.
| Discussion|| |
Embryologically, the uterus, cervix, and vagina are formed from the Mullerian ducts. There can be an absence of fusion or a full range of defects arising from anomalous fusion. These may occur as a result of genetic, environmental causes, and spontaneous developmental disabilities. This is a very rare case which questions the embryological development of the female genital tract. If we assume that cervical agenesis occurs due to the failure of fusion of the Mullerian ducts on the two sides, then it is not possible to have duplication of the cervix with a smooth, single fundus. The development, therefore, is not unidirectional from caudal to cephalad direction. This supports an alternative embryological hypothesis that fusion and resorption start at the isthmus and proceed in the cranial and caudal directions at the same time. This was supported by a study by Chang et al. They studied the anomalies associated with vaginal septum and came across similar cases.
A number of similar cases have come into literature in the last three decades.,,, All these support the alternative embryological hypothesis. While the AFS classification left many anomalies nonclassified, the ESHRE-2013 classification can incorporate this and many other anomalies. As per ESHRE, it can be denoted as U2bC1V2 making it easy to understand the complete anomaly. The complete diagnosis is possible only with a combination of MRI and diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy. The septate uterus (U2) is associated with a number of obstetric complications such as second-trimester abortions, preterm labor pains, malpresentations, and infertility. However, in this case, a trial for normal conception was planned. As the septum was complete, each cavity was uniformly smooth and in connection with a cervix. This might not be so bad for a spontaneous normal pregnancy. A surgery on the other hand would be highly challenging. There is also a high chance of cervical incompetence and cervical dystocia later.
The detailed classification also enables in planning the management of the patient depending on the primary complaints. In this case, as the primary complaint was a chronic pelvic discomfort and dyspareunia, the vaginal septum was removed and the complete uterine septum and its two cervices were left as such. With uncovering of the second cervix, subfertility may not be an issue. In case of pregnancy complications, a second stage surgery may be required.
In a similar case reported by Barbanti et al., a primigravida woman with 8 weeks missed abortion was incidentally diagnosed with the same anomaly. She too had a resection of the vaginal septum after uterine evacuation for complaints of long-standing dyspareunia. Further procedure was planned in case of future pregnancy complications. Ribeiro et al. reviewed those with a complete uterine septum, double cervix, and a vaginal septum. They found that most of them had dyspareunia and infertility. In a study by Chang et al., five nulligravida women underwent clinical, radiological, and surgical workup for complaints mainly pertaining to the vaginal septum and were found to have complete uterine septum with double cervix and a longitudinal vaginal septum. Studies suggest that surgical interventional treatments should be targeted to relieve symptoms and preserve fertility.,
The need for surgical or conservative management is controversial. The resection of the vaginal septum is easy and should be done in all. To improve obstetric outcomes, hysteroscopic resection of the septum is recommended., Regarding cervical unification, different studies have different recommendations. While some recommend it routinely, often under 3D transrectal sonography, others prefer to leave it to avoid problematic bleeding during surgery and cervical incompetence later on.
| Conclusion|| |
This case is one of the rare Mullerian anomalies, which is completely diagnosed with an MRI and diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. The ESHRE classification lists a wider range of anomalies compared to the AFS system. However, in women with complete uterine septum and double cervix, the role of prophylactic metroplasty in patients with no previous miscarriages or pregnancy complications is still not clear. A long-term follow-up of such patients will enable us to take a more informed decision in deciding the management.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
McBean JH, Brumsted JR. Septate uterus with cervical duplication: A rare anomaly. Fertil Steril 1994;62:415-7.
Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Sardo AD, Brucker S, Angelis CD, Gergolet M, et al
. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2032-44.
Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Suzumori N. Mullerian anomalies and recurrent miscarriage. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013;25:293-8.
Chang AS, Siegel CL, Moley KH, Ratts VS, Odem RR. Septate uterus with cervical duplication and longitudinal vaginal septum: A report of five new cases. Fertil Steril 2004;81:133-6.
Barbanti S, Chiamulera N, Beatriz B. Vaginal septoplasty in septate uterus with double cervix. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2014;2014:367360.
Ribeiro SC, Yamakami LY, Tormena RA, da Silva Pinheiro W, Almeida JA, Baracat EC. Septate uterus with cervical duplication and longitudinal vaginal septum. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2010;56:254-6.
Vijay A, Salve A, Murdia K, Chandra V. An unusual case of septate uterus with double cervix and longitudinal vaginal septum simulating uterus didelphys. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017;6:303-5.
Patton PE, Novy MJ, Lee DM, Hickok LR. The diagnosis and reproductive outcome after surgical treatment of the complete septate uterus, duplicated cervix and vaginal septum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:1669-75.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]