Journal of Human Reproductive Science
Home Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives
   Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size    Users online: 517


 
   Table of Contents     
CASE REPORT  
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 235-238
 

Complex mullerian malformation: A rare case of hypoplastic noncavitated uterus in the middle with two rudimentary horns on either side


Fertility Research and Women's Specialty Centre, GG Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission14-Dec-2019
Date of Decision28-Feb-2020
Date of Acceptance04-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication27-Oct-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Kamala Selvaraj
GG Fertility Research and Women's Specialty Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_158_19

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Mullerian anomalies which cause infertility in women were described by different classification systems. We report a rare case of uterine anomaly in a 16-year-old patient presented with primary amenorrhea. Her diagnostic laparoscopy findings revealed two uterine rudimentary horns on either side of the upper pelvis with a hypoplastic noncavitated central uterus. The pathogenesis of this anomaly may not be clearly defined but it was stated that these occur due to the developmental defects in embryo. This case report is one of the rarest cases presented and may signify the Mullerian duct anomaly.


Keywords: Hypoplastic uterus, Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser, Mullerian anomaly, rudimentary horn


How to cite this article:
Selvaraj K, Selvaraj P, Suganthi K. Complex mullerian malformation: A rare case of hypoplastic noncavitated uterus in the middle with two rudimentary horns on either side. J Hum Reprod Sci 2020;13:235-8

How to cite this URL:
Selvaraj K, Selvaraj P, Suganthi K. Complex mullerian malformation: A rare case of hypoplastic noncavitated uterus in the middle with two rudimentary horns on either side. J Hum Reprod Sci [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 1];13:235-8. Available from: https://www.jhrsonline.org/text.asp?2020/13/3/235/299240





   Introduction Top


Mullerian anomalies are rare and usually found in 1 of 4500 female cases of primary amenorrhea[1] and 2%–8% cases of infertile women.[2] They are mostly undiagnosed till the time of menarche. The anxious mother brings the child to the clinic to know the cause of her primary amenorrhea. Sometimes, married couples come with a history of infertility when this diagnosis is made.

Mullerian ducts differentiate into the  Fallopian tube More Detailss, uterus, and the upper part of the vagina during the intrauterine phase. When interruptions are found in the development of these Mullerian ducts, we encounter various malformations. These range from complete agenesis, hypoplasia, and fusion defects such as unicornuate uterus with or without a rudimentary horn, uterine didelphys, complete or partial bicornuate uterus, complete or partial septate uterus, and arcuate uterus. These anomalies are associated with normal functioning ovaries and normal appearing external genitalia.[2] Segmental or complete agenesis or hypoplasia may involve the vagina, cervix, fundus, tubes, or any combination of these structures.[3] Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is the most common example in this category.[4] We now report a rare variant of MRKH seen with midline hypoplastic noncavitated uterus.


   Case Report Top


A young unmarried 16-year-old girl was brought to our center by her anxious mother on November 19, 2016, with a history of primary amenorrhea. Parents were married by third-degree consanguinity. Her younger sister attained menarche at 13 years of age. On examination, her breast and external genitalia looked normal with scanty pubic hair (Tanner's Stage 3). Following the conservative approach, we did not do vaginal examination. She weighed 57.8 kg with a height of 154 cm.

Her transabdominal scan done on November 19, 2016, at our hospital showed a hypoplastic uterus measuring 3.4 cm × 1.4 cm, right ovary – 3.2 cm × 1.8 cm, and left ovary – 2.9 cm × 2.3 cm. We could not visualize the two rudimentary horns. Her karyotyping at our center was normal (46XX). Her hormonal analysis revealed normal levels of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone. She was put on cyclical hormones for 3–4 months, but there was no withdrawal bleeding following which she did not come for follow-up.

She came back to us after 3 years on June 2, 2019, with her two earlier ultrasonography reports done outside. The first on November 13, 2015 showed a hypoplastic uterus with normal looking ovaries and normal vagina, and the second on November 14, 2016 revealed uterine aplasia with bilateral rudimentary noncavitary horns with both ovaries normal, and on transrectal ultrasound, the vagina and rudimentary cervix were visualized. We were surprised to see the USG report of 2016 [Figure 1]. Hence, we decided to perform a diagnostic laparoscopy on June 7, 2019, which revealed a small hypoplastic uterus in the midline with two rudimentary horns on either side like MRKH with normal looking ovaries and tubes [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]. Her anti-Mullerian hormone, estradiol (E2), prolactin, and thyroid hormone levels were within normal limits.
Figure 1: Schematic diagram of Mullerian malformation

Click here to view
Figure 2: Noncavitated uterus with two rudimentary horns

Click here to view
Figure 3: Midline hypoplastic noncavitated uterus

Click here to view
Figure 4: Right rudimentary horn and ovary

Click here to view
Figure 5: Left rudimentary horn and ovary

Click here to view


The uterus in the middle had uterosacral ligaments on both sides with spread out ligament on the right side. On either side of the noncavitated uterus, there were two fleshy thick tube-like structures, at the end of which there were rudimentary horns on both sides with normal looking ovaries and tubes. This portion of anatomy looked like MRKH. Pelvic ultrasonography did not reveal any functioning endometrium in any of these structures. There was no family history of such condition, nor did her mother take any medicines or made any attempt to terminate this pregnancy. The etiology and pathophysiology of this anomaly is not known but looks like a variant of MRKH and Mullerian dysgenesis due to error in intrauterine development of the Mullerian system.

After adequate counseling and informed consent from the couple, we report the third case of a 16-year-old with hypoplastic noncavitated uterus in the middle with two rudimentary horns on either side (a variant of MRKH with noncavitated uterus in the middle).


   Results Top


This rare case of MRKH with noncavitated nonfunctional uterus in the middle is the second of its kind as mentioned in literature. It is generally said that at the gestational age of 45–49 days, the Mullerian duct system does not grow further for reasons unknown. This occurrence is sporadic, etiology being unknown.


   Discussion Top


Organogenesis of the female reproductive system is initiated from urogenital ridges which are developed at the 5th week of gestation. The incidence of Mullerian duct anomalies is between 0.001% and 10%.[5] Mullerian duct anomalies such as early developmental failure during 5 weeks of gestation may cause agenesis or hypoplastic uterus. Mullerian duct develops at 7 weeks of gestation. Fusion of Mullerian duct and formation of the uterus occurs at 10 weeks of gestation. This fusion is seen in the midline and progresses from the caudal portion to the cranial portion. The unfused parts of the Mullerian duct (cranial part) form fallopian tubes. Complete or partial developmental failure of the Mullerian duct may result in noncavitary rudimentary horns, which is one of the possible subtypes of unicornuate anomaly. The classification system of uterine anomalies is based on a single theory.[6] As ovaries develop from the primitive ectoderm and not from the Mullerian duct, there may not be abnormality in the female sexual development. Moreover, in the hypoplastic uterus, the organ is seen fully differentiated.[7],[8],[9]

In the literature, the first case was reported in the Journal of Human Reproduction by Nezhat and Smith, 1999. A nulligravid woman aged 18 years presented with severe dysmenorrhea was examined, and her diagnostic laparoscopy findings revealed unicornuate uterus with two cavitated, noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horns stacked one on top of the other.[10] The second case was reported in the same journal by Sadik et al., 2002. A 26-year-old female presented with primary amenorrhea, and infertility was evaluated, and her laparoscopic findings revealed hypoplastic noncavitated uterus and two rudimentary horns.[11] Controversy exists between genetic and familial etiology. It is a food for thought to consider a multifactorial pathogenesis, yet to be discovered.[12] There are two other recently reported cases of Mullerian duct anomaly, one with a longitudinal vaginal septum, two cervices, a uterine septum, and a single normal fundus was diagnosed during cesarean delivery following natural conception[13] and the other with a 23-year-old female with a partial uterine septum and a double cervix.[14]


   Conclusion Top


We have come across many cases of MRKH syndrome, several of them who got married have come and had vaginoplasty for sexual function. Many such women came back to us for infertility, and some of them conceived throughin vitro fertilization and embryo transfer through a surrogate with their own gametes. These children are all normal. Assisted reproduction is a boon to those who are unfortunately born with Mullerian anomaly, ovarian dysgenesis, premature ovarian failure, Turner's syndrome, unicornuate uterus, and other such conditions. If the awareness is created among all doctors, such patients can be helped to complete their family.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the legal guardian has given his consent for images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The guardian understands that names and initials will not be published, and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Acknowledgement:

We thank Ms. Sugunaa R and Ms. Srimathi E from HR department for their inputs in editing this article.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Tavera G, Lazebnik R. Müllerian agenesis masquerading as secondary amenorrhea. Case Rep Pediatr 2018;2018:6912351.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: A systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:371-82.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Yadav P. Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and classification of uterovaginal congenital anomalies. Med J Dr. DY Patil Univ 2017;10:510.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Jabeen M. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome. World J Laparosc Surg 2011;4:123-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pavone ME, King JA, Vlahos N. Septate uterus with cervical duplication and a longitudinal vaginal septum: A Müllerian anomaly without a classification. Fertil Steril 2006;85:494.e9-10.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Dunn R, Hantes J. Double cervix and vagina with a normal uterus and blind cervical pouch: A rare müllerian anomaly. Fertil Steril 2004;82:458-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Deo N, Annan HG. A unique mullerian anomaly of bicollis uterus and vaginal septum with abnormal cervical smears—a case report of pregnancy in such an anomaly. Gynecol Surg 2008;5:291-2.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Cunha GR, Robboy SJ, Kurita T, Isaacson D, Shen J, Cao M, et al. Development of the human female reproductive tract. Differentiation 2018;103:46-65.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Chandler TM, Machan LS, Cooperberg PL, Harris AC, Chang SD. Mullerian duct anomalies: From diagnosis to intervention. Br J Radiol 2009;82:1034-42.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Nezhat CR, Smith KS. Laparoscopic management of a unicornuate uterus with two cavitated, non-communicating rudimentary horns: Case report. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1965-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Sadik S, Taskin O, Sehirali S, Mendilcioglu I, Onoǧlu AS, Kursun S, et al. Complex Müllerian malformation: Report of a case with a hypoplastic non-cavitated uterus and two rudimentary horns. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1343-4.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Rall K, Eisenbeis S, Henninger V, Henes M, Wallwiener D, Bonin M, et al. Typical and atypical associated findings in a group of 346 patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester-Hauser Syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2015;28:362-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Brown SJ, Badawy SZ. A rare Mullerian duct anomaly not included in the classification system by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2013;2013:569480  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Monroig-Bosque PD, Okoye EI. Uterus septus subtotalis bicollis: A rare Mullerian duct abnormality. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2018;48:116-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
             

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,663 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed141    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded11    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal