|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 110-113
Body mass index and sperm quality: Is there a relationship?
Nataliia Mykhailivna Kozopas1, Olga Ihorivna Chornenka2, Mykola Zinoviyovych Vorobets3, Lubov Yevhenivna Lapovets1, Hanna Vasylivna Maksymyuk1
1 Department of Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
2 Department of Urology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
3 Department of Medical Centre “Intersono Medicover Group”, Lviv, Ukraine
|Date of Submission||03-Feb-2020|
|Date of Decision||19-Mar-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||17-Apr-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||09-Jul-2020|
Dr. Nataliia Mykhailivna Kozopas
Department of Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, 69 Pekarska Str., 79010 Lviv
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Context: Obesity and infertility are the major global public health problems. The evidences of adverse impact of adiposity on male fertility are contradictory. Aim: The objective of the study was to determine the effect of overweight and obesity on ejaculate quality, in particular, sperm parameters and biochemical markers. Subject and Design: The study involved 152 men who were distributed into three groups according to the body mass index (BMI, kg/m2): control group with normal values (18.5–24.9), preobese (25.0–29.9), and obese (≥30.0). Materials and Methods: Semen analysis included parameters: volume, sperm concentration and total count, morphology, progressive (PR) and total motility. Levels of fructose, citric acid, and zinc were measured in seminal plasma. Statistic: The results of the studies were analyzed using StatPlus: mac (AnalystSoft Inc., version 6). The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare groups. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: No significant differences of the semen parameters were observed between preobese and control group, except for increasing the number of abnormal spermatozoa. The obese group revealed lower concentration and total number of sperm, PR motility. BMI was negatively correlated with most semen parameters. The overweight group showed a decreasing of fructose levels and increasing of citric acid and zinc concentration, while no significant changes were observed in the obese group, except for a decreasing in fructose. Conclusions: The present study confirms that with the growth of BMI, the sperm quality deteriorates. Based on these results, we can assume that obesity may be an injurious factor of male infertility.
Keywords: Body mass index, infertility, obesity, overweight, sperm
|How to cite this article:|
Kozopas NM, Chornenka OI, Vorobets MZ, Lapovets LY, Maksymyuk HV. Body mass index and sperm quality: Is there a relationship?. J Hum Reprod Sci 2020;13:110-3
|How to cite this URL:|
Kozopas NM, Chornenka OI, Vorobets MZ, Lapovets LY, Maksymyuk HV. Body mass index and sperm quality: Is there a relationship?. J Hum Reprod Sci [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 27];13:110-3. Available from: https://www.jhrsonline.org/text.asp?2020/13/2/110/289223
| Introduction|| |
Obesity and infertility are the major global public health problems. In 2016, it was stated by the World Health Organization (WHO) that 39% of the population aged 18 years and older were overweight, and about 13% of the adults were obese. Notably, the proportions of men in these two cases were 39% and 11%, respectively.
The exacerbation of this situation had led to the development of a comprehensive guideline of male infertility which was prepared by the WHO in 2012. The working group also analyzed the research data which supported the potential influence of obesity on the reproductive function. Accordingly, it was founded that supporting evidence of this theory was conflicting. In particular, Sermondade et al. suggest that overweight and obesity in men was associated with rise of azoospermia and oligozoospermia, while one of the largest meta-analyses in this area by MacDonald et al. reports no correlation between body mass index (BMI) with sperm concentration and sperm count.
However, the WHO experts strongly recommended that men with fertility problems should be advised on a weight loss strategy if their waist circumference and BMI demonstrated the overweight or obesity.
It is known that many infertile couples seek help in specialized clinics. Today, the range of assisted reproductive technologies is quite wide, but the effectiveness of their application depends on many factors. In particular, research results have suggested that paternal obesity adversely affects clinical pregnancy rates afterin vitro fertilization.,
In addition, recent studies have affirmed that weight loss in obese men is affiliated with an improvement in sperm parameters; however, it is difficult to investigate the direct negative impact of BMI growth on the ejaculate quality.,
Therefore, the aim of the presented work is to establish the effect of overweight and obesity on sperm counts and biochemical parameters of male ejaculate quality. Given the discrepancies in the results of various studies that inspected the effects of obesity on male fertility,, and the tendency to decreasing in the sperm quality in the population, further investigations are required.
The present work is aimed to establish the effect of overweight and obesity on sperm parameters and biochemical markers which display the ejaculate quality.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The study included 152 men who were observed for infertility at a reproductive clinic during 2018. BMI was computed for each patient (BMI, kg/m2). Based on these data, three groups were formed: normal (18.5–24.9), overweight or preobesity (25.0–29.9), and obesity (≥30.0). Patients with any disorders of the reproductive system (congenital pathologies, varicocele, epididymitis, prostatitis, and postoperative conditions) were excluded from the study.
Semen samples were obtained by masturbation after 2–7 days of sexual abstinence in a special clinic room. The material was collected into sterile containers.
The ejaculate was evaluated after dilution in accordance to the WHO Guidelines 2010 and included parameters: volume, sperm concentration and total count, progressive (PR) and total motility (PR + nonprogressive), immotile spermatozoa, percentage of normal morphological forms, and concentration of white blood cells. Patients with leukospermia (>1 × 106/ml) and azoospermia were excluded from the study. The main sperm parameters were determined using the sperm quality analyzer SQA-V V. 2.47 (Medical Electronic Systems Ltd, Caesarea Industrial Park, Israel).
Biochemical markers of seminal plasma were determined by spectrophotometry using the biochemical analyzer BioSystem (Biosystems S.A., Barcelona, 2011) and included fructose, citric acid, and zinc.
We undersign, certificate that all the procedures and experiments of this study respect the ethical standards in the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5), as well as the national law.
The results of the studies were analyzed using StatPlus:mac LE software, version 6.1.25 (StatPlus:mac, AnalystSoft Inc., 2016). The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare groups. The data were expressed as median and range (minimum–maximum value). Pearson's correlation coefficient was also calculated. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
| Results|| |
This study involved 152 men, aged 21–53 years, who were included in the control and two study groups, depending on the BMI. The clinical data and routine sperm parameters of the study groups are described in [Table 1].
No significant differences of the semen parameters were observed between patients with overweight and control group, except for an increasing in the number of pathological forms of sperm. Whereas in the obesity group revealed a significant deterioration of sperm quality, in particular, lower concentration and total number of spermatozoa in ejaculate and lower PR motility.
The biochemical analysis of seminal plasma [Table 2] in the preobesity group showed a decreasing of fructose levels (μmol/ejaculate) by 23% compared to the control group (P < 0.05), increasing in citric acid (μmol/ejaculate) levels by 27%, and higher zinc concentration (μmol/L) by 20% compared to the control group (P < 0.05). On the other hand, no significant changes in biochemical parameters were observed in the obesity group, except for a decreasing in fructose concentration compared to the control group.
Correlation analysis revealed a tendency for increasing in BMI value with growing age of men (r = 0.36; P<0.05). In all patients, a BMI negatively correlated with concentration (r = −0.17; P<0.05) and total number of spermatozoa in the ejaculate (r = 0.21; P<0.05), normal morphology (r = −0.27; P<0.05), and PR and total motility (r = 0.18, P<0.05; r = −0.22, P<0.05, accordingly). Levels of biochemical markers in seminal plasma did not significantly correlate with BMI (P > 0.05 in all cases).
| Discussion|| |
This study showed that with the increase of BMI and with the progress of adiposity, the quality of ejaculate significantly deteriorates, in particular, sperm concentration, total number of spermatozoa and motility.
Various studies have reported about negative correlation between obesity, increasing BMI, and basic sperm parameters, including volume, sperm count, and motility. Jensen et al., 2004 and Bieniek et al. found that men with obesity were more likely to have oligozoospermia and azoospermia. Our findings also are consistent with recent studies reporting an association of BMI with decreased total sperm count,, and sperm motility.,
Preobese and obese men in this study had lower seminal fructose levels compared to men with normal weight. However, data from numerous studies that evaluated fructose concentration in seminal plasma are quite controversial. For example, Luque et al. had reported about reducing seminal fructose levels in morbidly obese men, and another studies have found a positive or no correlation of BMI with seminal fructose.,
Interestingly, the rising concentration of seminal zinc was found only in the preobese group. Kasperczyk et al. reported that the increasing zinc in seminal plasma is associated with an improvement of semen parameters. Obviously, this is due to the involvement of zinc in the stabilization processes of membranes and germ cells chromatin as well as due to zinc-induced reduction of the oxidative stress in overweight men.,
Since citric acid has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory functions in tissues damaged by environmental factors, we assume that increasing its concentration in studied samples of preobese group was associated with low-grade systemic inflammation and oxidative stress.
An evaluation of the biochemical parameters of ejaculate such as fructose, citric acid, and zinc as markers of accessory sex glands is necessary in further studies, especially in the progression of adiposity.
| Conclusions|| |
The present study confirms that with the growth of BMI the sperm quality deteriorates. Based on these results, we can assume that obesity may be an injurious factor of male infertility. Further studies are required to elucidate the mechanism of negative impact of obesity on male reproductive function.
We are grateful to Dr. Uliana Dorofeyeva, Medical Director of Medical Centre “Intersono Medicover Group,” for cooperation, and the laboratory staff from this Center for their assistance in collecting the material for research.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Barratt CL, Björndahl L, De Jonge CJ, Lamb DJ, Osorio Martini F, McLachlan R, et al
. The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance–challenges and future research opportunities. Hum Reprod Update 2017;23:1-21.
Sermondade N, Faure C, Fezeu L, Shayeb AG, Bonde JP, Jensen TK, et al
. BMI in relation to sperm count: an updated systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:221-31.
MacDonald AA, Herbison GP, Showell M, Farquhar CM. The impact of body mass index on semen parameters and reproductive hormones in human males: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2010;16:293-311.
Merhi ZO, Keltz J, Zapantis A, Younger J, Berger D, Lieman HJ, et al
. Male adiposity impairs clinical pregnancy rate by in vitro
fertilization without affecting day 3 embryo quality. Obesity 2013;21:1608-12.
Yang Q, Zhao F, Hu L, Bai R, Zhang N, Yao G, et al
. Effect of paternal overweight or obesity on IVF treatment outcomes and the possible mechanisms involved. Sci Rep 2016;6:29787.
Håkonsen LB, Thulstrup AM, Aggerholm AS, Olsen J, Bonde JP, Andersen CY, et al
. Does weight loss improve semen quality and reproductive hormones? Results from a cohort of severely obese men. Reprod Health 2011;8:24.
Mir J, Franken D, Andrabi SW, Ashraf M, Rao K. Impact of weight loss on sperm DNA integrity in obese men. Andrologia 2018;50:e12957.
Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkeblek NE. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. BMJ 1992;305:609-13.
World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the Examination and processing of human semen. Issue 10: World Health Organization; 2010. p. 286.
Schmidt FH. Die enzymatische bestimmung von glucose und fructose nebeneinander. Klin Wochenschr 1961;39:1244-7.
Moellering H, Gruber W. Determination of citrate with citrate lyase. Anal Biochem 1966;17:369-76.
Tetsuo M, Saito M, Horiguchi D, Kina K. A highly sensitive colorimetric determination of serum zinc using water-soluble pyridylazo dye. Clin Chim Acta 1982;120:127-35.
Kosopas NM, Maksymyuk GV, Lapovets LE, Odnorig LO. Metabolic syndrome and male infertility: A modern look at the problem. Bull Probl Biol Med 2018;1:26.
Jensen T, Andersson A, Jorgensen N, Andersen A, Carlsen E, Petersen J, et al
. Body mass index in relation to semen quality and reproductive hormones among 1,558 Danish men. Fertil Steril 2004;82:863-70.
Bieniek JM, Kashanian JA, Deibert CM, Grober ED, Lo KC, Brannigan RE, et al
. Influence of increasing body mass index on semen and reproductive hormonal parameters in a multi-institutional cohort of subfertile men. Fertil Steril 2016;106:1070-5.
Koloszár S, Fejes I, Závaczki Z, Daru J, Szöllősi J, Pál A. Effect of body weight on sperm concentration in normozoospermic males. Arch Androl 2005;51:299-304.
Aggerholm A, Thulstrup A, Toft G, Ramlauhansen C, Bonde J. Is overweight a risk factor for reduced semen quality and altered serum sex hormone profile? Fertil Steril 2008;90:619-26.
Stewart TM, Liu DY, Garrett C, Brown EH, Baker HW. Recruitment bias in studies of semen and other factors affecting pregnancy rates in fertile men. Hum Reprod 2009;24:2401-8.
Kort HI, Massey JB, Elsner CW, Mitchell-Leef D, Shapiro DB, Witt MA, et al
. Impact of body mass index values on sperm quantity and quality. J Androl 2006;27:450-2.
Luque EM, Tissera A, Gaggino MP, Molina RI, Mangeaud A, Vincenti LM, et al
. Body mass index and human sperm quality: neither one extreme nor the other. Reprod Fertil Dev 2017;29:731.
Flanagan J, Lehtihet M, Björndahl L, Arver S, Kvist U. 255 Impact of age, days of abstinence, and BMI on results of semen analysis from men of sub-fertile couples. Eur Urol Suppl 2014;13:e255.
Martini AC, Tissera A, Estofán D, Molina RI, Mangeaud A, de Cuneo MF, et al
. Overweight and seminal quality: A study of 794 patients. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1739-43.
Lozano-Hernández R, Gualdrón J, Camejo MI, Judith V, Antonio V. Markers of accessory glands and seminal parameters in infertile men with overweight and obesity. J Metab Syndr 2017;6:1-4.
Kasperczyk A, Dobrakowski M, Czuba Z, Kapka-Skrzypczak L, Kasperczyk S. Environmental exposure to zinc and copper influences sperm quality in fertile males. Ann Agric Environ Med 2015;23:138-43.
Marushchak M, Krynytska I, Mazur L, Yastremska S, Begosh N. The thiol-disulfide homeostasis and its role in the pathogenesis of the experimental alimentary obesity. Bangladesh J Med Sci 2011;4:10-9.
Ricardo LH. Male Accessory Glands and Sperm Function. In: Spermatozoa – Facts and Perspectives. Ch. 6. London: InTech; 2018.
[Table 1], [Table 2]