|
 |
|
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
|
|
|
| Year : 2017 | Volume
: 10
| Issue : 2 | Page : 86-90 |
| |
To study the vitamin D levels in infertile females and correlation of Vitamin D deficiency with AMH levels in comparison to fertile females
Indu Lata1, Swasti Tiwari2, Amrit Gupta1, Subhash Yadav3, Shashi Yadav2
1 Department of Maternal and Reproductive Health, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Department of Endocrinology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| Date of Web Publication | 10-Aug-2017 |
Correspondence Address:
Indu Lata
Department of Maternal and Reproductive Health, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_105_16
 Abstract | | |
Context: Human and animal data suggest that low vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D) status is associated with impaired fertility, endometriosis, and polycystic ovary syndrome. Vitamin D regulates antimullerian hormone (AMH), FSH, mRNA, and expression of genes in reproductive tissues, implicating a role in female reproduction. Aims: To study the vitamin D levels in infertile females and to know the correlation of vitamin D deficiency (VDD) with serum AMH in infertile females compare to fertile females. Settings And Design: This prospective study was conducted in department of Maternal and Reproductive Health in between April 2014 and April 2016. Materials and Methods: After matching inclusion and exclusion criteria out of total 70 infertile females, 45 were found to have VDD. Of these 35 patients were identified as cases; in whom, the AMH levels were assessed. As control 35 fertile normal females were taken, in which vitamin D and AMH were taken. In both groups, correlation of VDD with AMH was studied. Statistical Analysis Used: To analyze the correlation between vitamin D and AMH linear regression test and for comparison of both the groups, two sample t tests were used. Results: The VDD was present in 64.28% of infertile females. In vitamin D deficient cases, the mean for vitamin D was 6.18 ± 2.09 and AMH was 1.94 ± 1.30. In vitamin D deficient controls, the mean for vitamin D was 4.85 ± 3.02 and AMH was 3.47 ± 2.59. On comparison, the vitamin D levels were lower in fertile than infertile females, which was significant (P = 0.04), and AMH levels were lower in cases than control group (P = 0.003). Conclusion: The VDD was present in 64.28% of infertile females. No significant correlation was found in between VDD and AMH levels in both the groups.
Keywords: AMH, fertile, infertile, outcome, vitamin D deficiency
How to cite this article:
Lata I, Tiwari S, Gupta A, Yadav S, Yadav S. To study the vitamin D levels in infertile females and correlation of Vitamin D deficiency with AMH levels in comparison to fertile females. J Hum Reprod Sci 2017;10:86-90 |
How to cite this URL:
Lata I, Tiwari S, Gupta A, Yadav S, Yadav S. To study the vitamin D levels in infertile females and correlation of Vitamin D deficiency with AMH levels in comparison to fertile females. J Hum Reprod Sci [serial online] 2017 [cited 2023 Mar 24];10:86-90. Available from: https://www.jhrsonline.org/text.asp?2017/10/2/86/212771 |
| Introduction | |  |
Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is a major health problem in both the developed and developing countries across the world. Recent epidemiologic studies have shown relationships between low vitamin D levels have harmful effects on various systems and multiple disease states. Vitamin D is also responsible for expression of a large number of genes in reproductive tissues, implicating a role for vitamin D in female reproduction. Human and animal data suggest that low vitamin D status is associated with impaired fertility and endometriosis. Serum 25(OH)D provides the single best assessment of vitamin D status; it has a half-life of about 3 weeks, making it the most suitable indicator of vitamin D status.[1]
Vitamin D also inhibits cell proliferation and stimulates cell differentiation. This hormone primarily exerts its effects through the vitamin D receptor (VDR). Through its receptor, vitamin D can modify gene transcription, as well as protein and messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) production. In animal studies, dietary VDD leads to a 25% reduction in overall fertility.[2] In various studies, the role of VDD has been correlated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and a myriad of pregnancy-related disorders.[3]
Antimullerian hormone (AMH) is a dimeric glycoprotein, in women it is produced by granulosa cells, from preantral and antral follicles in ovary. The main physiological role of AMH in the ovary seems to be limited to the inhibition of the early stages of follicular development, maintaining ovarian reserve and modifying the follicles response to follicular stimulating hormone (FSH).[4] AMH also reduces follicle sensitivity to FSH in vivo, and in vitro it inhibit FSH-induced preantralfollicle growth.[5] In reproductive medicine, the AMH levels measure both ovarian reserve (low levels) and PCOS status (high levels).[6]
AMH emerged as a target gene regulated by vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) from complimentary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) microarray analysis of a prostate cancer cell line.[7] The AMH–mRNA expression is upregulated in response to vitamin D in vitro, and these investigators subsequently identified a functional VDR element in the human AMH promoter, demonstrating a direct effect of vitamin D on AMH expression. In addition, vitamin D regulates AMH, FSH, and mRNA, and likely to involved in follicle-selection process.[8] At present, there is considerable controversy in the literature regarding whether vitamin D has any effect on AMH production, as well as its effect on fertility. Therefore, we planned this study to see the spectrum of vitamin D levels in infertile females and to examine the correlation between serum AMH and vitamin D status in ovulatory fertile females compare to infertile females.
| Materials and Methods | | |
After approval from institute ethics committee and clinical trial registration, this prospective study was done on patients attending infertility outpatient department (OPD) between April 2014 and April 2016. After written informed consent and following good clinical practice guidelines, the total 70 infertile patients following inclusion criteria were taken as cases. In these patient’s, levels of vitamin D were done. Out of total 70 infertile females, 45 were found to have VDD. Of these 35 patients were identified as cases; in whom, the AMH levels were assessed. In these patients, the AMH levels were assessed.
The vitamin D levels were classified in three categories as deficiency, insufficiency, and sufficiency (as per according Institute of Medicine and EURONUT SENECA study,[9] SUVIMAX study,[10] and Goswami et al.[11]).The reference levels for serum (blood) of vitamin D [25(OH)D]: deficiency <10 ng/ml, insufficiency 10 to 20 ng/ml, and adequate levels were taken >20 ng/ml. The fertile females as control group, coming to our OPD for taking consultation due to other causes and normal working staff members were screened for vitamin D levels and who were found vitamin D deficient were enrolled as control. The 35 fertile females having VDD were further assessed for AMH levels.- Patient N = 70 (enrolled to study vitamin D levels in infertile females with unexplained infertility)
- Cases N1 = 35 (infertile females with VDD, for AMH levels assessment)
- Control N2 = 35 (fertile females with VDD, for AMH levels assessment).
Inclusion criteria
Infertile females with unexplained infertility, of age group between 18 and 40 years, as cases and healthy fertile females between same age group as control.
Exclusion criteria
History of smoking (tobacco use), oral contraceptive pill, any hormonal or steroid drug use, known VDD, obesity (body mass index, BMI > 35), endometriosis, thyroid disorders, autoimmune disease, tubal factor, male factor, or polycystic ovarian syndrome.
Study design
Age, duration of married life, duration and type of infertility, previous obstetrical history, and education levels were retrieved for all women who met the inclusion criteria as cases and control.
Biochemical analysis
Plasma AMH levels were measured in duplicate using the ultrasensitive AMH Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) platform {Ansh Labs, Webster, Texas, USA}. The limit of detection was 0.023 ng/ml with 95% probability of detection. Blood samples were taken at any time in the menstrual cycle, and then the serum was separated within 1 h of venipuncture and stored at 4°C until assayed within 72 h of collection.
Vitamin D analysis
Vitamin D levels were measured in duplicate using a Liasion 25OH vitamin D total assay (DiaSorin, Stillwater, Minnesota, USA), using a competitive chemiluminescent immunoassay, as per the manufacturers guidelines.
Power of study
To study VDD in infertile females, the sample size was 70 based on standard deviation (SD) = 9, clinical significance difference = 5%, level of significance (P = 0.05), and power of the test 90%.
The normal AMH level in fertile females were taken 1.1 to 3.5 and in infertile females were taken as below 1.1.[6] But for calculation purposes, to study the AMH level in vitamin D deficient infertile and fertile females, taking the mean AMH level in infertile 1.0 ± 0.6 and in fertile 3.0 ± 0.6, sample size of 31 in each group were chosen. This was to achieve 90% power to detect a difference between the null hypothesis that both group means with a significance level (alpha) of 0.050 using two sided two-sample t test. To prevent drop out, we had taken 35 cases in each group. Similarly, in 35 fertile women the AMH levels were done and correlation with vitamin D was seen. After evaluating the correlation, we also compared the both groups.
Statistical analysis
To analyze the correlation between vitamin D and AMH linear regression test and for comparison of both the groups, two sample t tests were used.
| Results | | |
In this study, maximum patients were of age 26 to 30 years having primary infertility (55.71%) of duration of 1 to 5 years (95.71%) with education level graduation and above (58.57%). All patients were enquired about their profession and 87.50% were nonprofessional (housewife) as shown in [Table 1]. Our study was done in infertile female’s population to see the spectrum of vitamin D levels. Overall, 64.28% infertile females had VDD (up to 10 ng/ml), 30.0% displayed vitamin D insufficiency (10–20 ng/ml), whereas 5.71% of the study population exhibited adequate levels of vitamin D levels (>20 ng/ml). The mean value for vitamin D was 9.30 ± 5.59 ng/ml, as shown in [Table 2]. | Table 1: Demographic profile and infertility characteristics of cases, infertile group (N=70)
Click here to view |
In vitamin D deficient cases (infertile females), the mean for vitamin D was 6.18 ± 2.09 and for AMH was 1.94 ± 1.30. In vitamin D deficient controls (fertile females), the mean for vitamin D was 4.85 ± 3.02 and for AMH was 3.47 ± 2.59. On comparison of these two groups infertile group had significantly [Table 3] lower [Table 4] levels [Table 5] of AMH (P = 0.003) but higher levels of vitamin D (P = 0.04) compared to fertile group in our study [Table 6]. However, no significant correlation was found between vitamin D and AMH levels in both the groups. | Table 3: Age profile of vitamin D deficient cases (N1=35) and controls (N2 = 35)
Click here to view |
 | Table 4: BMI profile of vitamin D deficient cases (N1 =35) and controls (N2 = 35)
Click here to view |
 | Table 5: AMH levels in vitamin D deficient infertile and fertile females
Click here to view |
 | Table 6: Mean values of AMH and vitamin D levels in infertile and fertile females
Click here to view |
| Discussion | | |
In the present study, we had seen the spectrum of vitamin D levels in women of reproductive age group with primary infertility with unexplained causes and prevalence of VDD in infertile females. In our study, we found the prevalence of VDD was 64.28% in infertile females. In a study, 81.3 to 98.2% of women with impaired fertility had deficient or insufficient vitamin D levels.[12] Our results are comparable to these results with a slight difference may be because of population and geographical differences.
In our study on comparison of these two groups, vitamin D levels were lower in control group (fertile females) than cases (infertile females), which was significant (P = 0.04). The AMH levels were lower in cases than control group (P = 0.003), which might be a cause of infertility in infertile females. AMH is a predictor of ovarian reserve and ovarian responsiveness that directly affect the fertility of a women, excluding the other causes if infertility.
Vitamin D is also known as “anti-ricketic factor or sunshine vitamin.” Dietary intakes generally has only a minor influence on serum levels outside of the consumption of vitamin D supplements.[13] Even in tropical countries, despite of ample sunlight (required for the synthesis of vitamin D endogenously), VDD is prevalent in range of 50 to 90% among all the age groups.[14] Vitamin D levels did not vary according to age or infertility associated disorders.[12] Another study reported the prevalence of VDD significantly higher in the subfertility group than controls (59.0 versus 40.4%; P < 0.01).[15] Only one study reported a positive relationship between vitamin D and serum AMH levels.[16] However, this study admits the significant methodological weakness because of very low numbers of subjects.
According to a study, vitamin D supplementation can reduce high AMH production, leading to increase follicular sensitivity to FSH and return to normal ovulation.[17] An observational study reported a insignificant weak negative correlation between serum vitamin D and AMH in young individuals, but a weak possible positive correlation between AMH and vitamin D in women aged 40 years or older. The existing literature does not provide any definitive and consistent pattern for how vitamin D may affect AMH production or serum levels. The key finding in our prospective study in women of child bearing age that serum vitamin D levels appear to be unrelated to AMH levels. Merhi et al. had also reported,no relationship between serum vitamin D and AMH levels in women aged 35 to 40 years, with similar results.[18]
There is no consensus that how vitamin D may affect AMH production or vitamin D has really any role in AMH production. Similar to the in vivo studies, the in vitro data analyzing the influence of vitamin D on AMH production are also contradictory. Early studies using a prostatic cancer cell line showed that vitamin D could increase AMH.[8],[19] It has also been reported that women with darker skin pigmentation have lower serum AMH levels.[20] This has been also seen that women with dark skin have faster rate of decline in AMH levels than Caucasian women, resulting earlier onset of menopause.[21],[22] Considering that vitamin D increases granulosa cell production of AMH, it is theoretically possible that vitamin D supplementation in VDD could improve the ovarian reserve and delay the onset of menopause.[23]
Limitations of our study are small sample size and prospective study, so we recommend further larger sample size study, so that stronger recommendations can be predicted that can be utilized for social betterment.
| Conclusion | | |
The prevalence of VDD was 64.28% in infertile women groups. There was no correlation found between VDD and AMH levels in both the infertile and fertile women groups. The rate of VDD among women with impaired fertility is alarming. Prospective further studies are pressingly needed to confirm a causal relationship and to investigate the potential therapeutic benefits of vitamin D supplementation in this population.
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by the Intramural Grant from Research Committee, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Criteria for Authorship: All listed above qualify as per guidelines and had done substantial work for this manuscript. The entire author takes responsibility of intellectual content of the paper. The details of work done by authors are as follows; I.L.: original idea conceiving or designing the study, doing whole work as team leader, data collection, data analysis, and write manuscript; S.Y.: Lab work, data collection, and compilation; S.Y.: manuscript and proof reading. S.T.: Lab work, data collection, and compilation and analysis of data; A.G.: manuscript review, and proof reading.
Financial support and sponsorship
This study was conducted with the help of Intramural Project grant sponsored by SGPGIMS, Lucknow, UP, India.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Feldman D, Pike JW, Glorieux FH. Vitamin D. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005. p. 15-36.  |
| 2. | Bakhshalizadeh S, Amidi F, Alleyassin A, Soleimani M, Shirazi R, Shabani Nashtaei M. Modulation of steroidogenesis by vitamin D3 in granulosa cells of the mouse model of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2017;27:1-12. |
| 3. | Irani M, Merhi Z. Role of vitamin D in ovarian physiology and its implication in reproduction: a systematic review. Fertil Steril 2014;102:460-68. |
| 4. | Dewailly D, Andersen CY, Balen A, Broekmans F, Dilaver N, Fanchin R et al. The physiology and clinical utility of anti-mullerian hormone in women. Hum Reprod Update 2014;20:370-85. |
| 5. | Durlinger AL, Gruijters MJ, Kramer P, Karels B, Ingraham HA, Nachtigal MW et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone attenuates the effects of FSH on follicle development in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology 2001;142:4891-9. |
| 6. | Hazout A, Bouchard P, Seifer D, Aussage P, Marie Junca A, Cohen-Bacrie P. Serum antimüllerian hormone/müllerian-inhibiting substance appears to be a more discriminatory marker of assisted reproductive technology outcome than follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, or estradiol. Fertil Steril 2004;82:1323-29. |
| 7. | Krishnan AV, Moreno J, Nonn L, Malloy PJ, Swami S, Peng L et al. Novel pathways that contribute to the anti-proliferative and chemopreventative activities of vitamin D in prostate cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2007;103:694-702. |
| 8. | Malloy PJ, Peng L, Wang J, Feldman D. Interaction of the vitamin D receptor with a vitamin D response element in the Mullerian-inhibiting substance (MIS) promoter: regulation of MIS expression by vitamin D in prostate cancer cells. Endocrinology 2009;150:1580-7. |
| 9. | Van der Wielen RP, Löwik MR, van den Berg H, de Groot LC, Haller J, Moreiras O. Serum vitamin D concentrations among elderly people in Europe. Lancet 1995;346:207-10. |
| 10. | Chapuy MC, Preziosi P, Maamer M, Arnaud S, Galan P, Hercberg S. Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in an adult normal population. Osteoporos Int 1997;7:439-43. |
| 11. | Goswami R, Vatsa M, Sreenivas V, Singh U, Gupta N, Lakshmy R et al. Skeletal muscle strength in young Asian Indian females after vitamin D and calcium supplementation: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:4709-16. |
| 12. | Dressler N, Chandra A, Aguirre Dávila L, Spineli LM, Schippert C, von Versen-Hoynck F. BMI and season are associated with vitamin D deficiency in women with impaired fertility: a two-centre analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;293:907-14. |
| 13. | Dixon KM, Mason RS. Vitamin D. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2009;41:982-5. |
| 14. | Mehlawat U, Singh P, Pande S. Review article current status of vitamin-D deficiency in India. Innov Pharm Pharmacother 2014;2:328-35. |
| 15. | Al-Jaroudi D, Al-Banyan N, Aljohani NJ, Kaddour O, Al-Tannir M. Vitamin D deficiency among subfertile women: case-control study. Gynecol Endocrinol 2016;32:272-5. |
| 16. | Dennis NA, Houghton LA, Jones GT, van Rij AM, Morgan K, McLennan IS. The level of serum anti-Müllerian hormone correlates with vitamin D status in men and women but not in boys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:2450-5. |
| 17. | Irani M, Minkoff H, Seifer DB, Merhi Z. Vitamin D increases serum levels of the soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products in women with PCOS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:886-90. |
| 18. | Merhi ZO, Seifer DB, Weedon J, Adeyemi O, Holman S, Anastos K et al. Circulating vitamin D correlates with serum antimüllerian hormone levels in late-reproductive-aged women: Women’s Interagency HIV study. Fertil Steril 2012;98:228-34. |
| 19. | Wojtusik J, Johnson PA. Vitamin D regulates anti-Mullerian hormone expression in granulosa cells of the hen. Biol Reprod 2012;86:91. |
| 20. | Seifer DB, Golub ET, Lambert-Messerlian G, Benning L, Anastos K, Watts DH et al. Variations in serum müllerian inhibiting substance between white, black, and Hispanic women. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1674-8. |
| 21. | Gold EB. The timing of the age at which natural menopause occurs. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2011;38:425-40. |
| 22. | Tal R, Seifer DB. Potential mechanisms for racial and ethnic differences in antimüllerian hormone and ovarian reserve. Int J Endocrinol 2013;2013:818912. |
| 23. | Schoenaker DA, Jackson CA, Rowlands JV, Mishra GD. Socioeconomic position, lifestyle factors and age at natural menopause: a systematic review and meta-analyses of studies across six continents. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43:1542-62. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Seasonal dynamic of cholecalciferol (D3) and anti-Muellerian hormone (AMH) with impact on ovarian response and IVF/ICSI |
|
| Nina Rogenhofer, Udo Jeschke, Viktoria von Schönfeldt, Sven Mahner, Christian J. Thaler | | Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2022; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Factors Affecting Female Infertility in the Population of Gujarat (India): A Comprehensive Study |
|
| Priyanka Sanghavi, Bhumika Savsaiya, Hitesh Patel, Kajal Patel, Divya Chandel | | Journal für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie/Österreich. 2022; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Does Maternal Vitamin D Level Affect the Ovarian Reserve of Female Newborn Infants? |
|
| Ebru Sahin Gulec, Esra Bahar Gur, Secil Kurtulmus, Banu Isbilen Basok, Duygu Cebecik Ozmus, Veli Iyilikci, Ahmet Demir | | Fetal and Pediatric Pathology. 2022; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Does vitamin D supplementation improve ovarian reserve in women with diminished ovarian reserve and vitamin D deficiency: a before-and-after intervention study |
|
| Shahintaj Aramesh, Touran Alifarja, Ramin Jannesar, Parvin Ghaffari, Raziyeh Vanda, Fatemeh Bazarganipour | | BMC Endocrine Disorders. 2021; 21(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between vitamin D and ovarian reserve |
|
| Elham Karimi, Arman Arab, Masoumeh Rafiee, Reza Amani | | Scientific Reports. 2021; 11(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
Does the serum vitamin D status and its possible effect on serum anti-müllerian hormone levels predict fertility in premenopausal women? |
|
| OyinkansolaIslamiyat Lawal | | Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2021; 14(3): 244 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 7 |
The Association between Vitamin D and Anti-Müllerian Hormone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
|
| Irene Moridi, Alice Chen, Oded Tal, Reshef Tal | | Nutrients. 2020; 12(6): 1567 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
