Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences

LETTER TO EDITOR
Year
: 2010  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 116-

Diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer


Viroj Wiwanitkit 
 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok - 10330, Thailand

Correspondence Address:
Viroj Wiwanitkit
Wiwanitkit House, Bangkhae, Bangkok - 10160
Thailand




How to cite this article:
Wiwanitkit V. Diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer.J Hum Reprod Sci 2010;3:116-116


How to cite this URL:
Wiwanitkit V. Diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer. J Hum Reprod Sci [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Sep 20 ];3:116-116
Available from: http://www.jhrsonline.org/text.asp?2010/3/2/116/69336


Full Text

Sir,

I read the recent rare case report on primary ovarian cancer by Panda et al. with a great interest. [1] According to this report, some critical concerns on the diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer should be mentioned. Panda et al. made a conclusion that "now, with ultrasonographic advances, it can be diagnosed early, leading to conservative treatment and preservative surgery." [1] Indeed, the role of ultrasonography for the detection of ectopic pregnancy is of no doubt. However, its role for specific diagnosis of primary ovarian pregnancy is still questionable. Only a gestation sac in adnexa area, which cannot definitely diagnose of primary ovarian pregnancy, is the common ultrasonographic finding. [2] The actual diagnosis is usually due to the confirmation by histopathological study. The ultrasonography could only help early detect the ectopic pregnancies, of which, only a few can be primary ovarian pregnancy.

References

1Panda S, Darlong LM, Singh S, Borah T. Case report of a primary ovarian pregnancy in a primigravida. J Hum Reprod Sci 2009;2: 90-2.
2Chandrasekhar C. Ectopic pregnancy: A pictorial review. Clin Imaging 2008;32:468-73.