Journal of Human Reproductive Science
Home Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives
   Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size    Users online: 973


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 240-246
Observational study of the social determinants of health in subfertile versus nonsubfertile women


1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fuenlabrada University Hospital, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
2 IVI RMA Madrid, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Pedro M Tabernero-Rico
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Fuenlabrada, 2, Camino Del Molino, Fuenlabrada 28942, Madrid
Spain
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_20_19

Rights and Permissions

Context: Subfertility affects about 15% of couples worldwide. There are several factors that affect subfertility called social determinants of health (SDH): biological factors as age, ethnic origin, and body mass index; behavioral factors as alcohol intake, smoking, coffee, dietary restriction, physical activity, and psychological state; and contextual factors as education, work activity, and income level. Aims: The aim of the study is to evaluate the distribution's relevance of the SDH in subfertile women versus nonsubfertile women. Settings and Design: A prospective comparative study with two groups of women recruited over 1 year at hospital consultation: one group with subfertile women excluding women without a male partner or with a previous child and another one formed by primigravidae, excluding those receiving assisted reproduction techniques to become pregnant. Subjects and Methods: We compare the different factors between subfertile and nonsubfertile women one by one. Second, a multivariate analysis was conducted with logistic regression. In all cases, informed consent was obtained. Results: Regular physical exercise 3–4 times/week (odds ratio [OR]: 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15–0.71) or healthy food products such as fish 1–2 times/week (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.17–0.95) were associated with nonsubfertile women. Conclusions: The distribution of SDH in natural fertility is not altogether homogeneous. Weight control by means of restricting calorie intake, greater consumption of healthy foods such as fish, regular physical exercise, and lower age are positively associated with fertility. Population-level intervention is possible to improve women's health, as these are modifiable factors. Ethnic origin can be considered as a relevant factor, as it may condition the distribution of other determinants.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article  Email this article
    

  Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
   Citation Manager
  Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed113    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded11    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal