Journal of Human Reproductive Science
Home Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives
   Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size    Users online: 301


 
   Table of Contents     
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 279-285
 

An intrauterine insemination audit at tertiary care hospital: A 4½ years' retrospective analysis of 800 intrauterine insemination cycles


IVF and Fertility Research Centre, ESIC-PGIMSR Model Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication20-Nov-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ashish Fauzdar
IVF and Fertility Research Centre, ESIC-PGIMSR Model Hospital, New Delhi - 110 015
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_34_18

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Background: There are many variables that may influence the success rates of intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment. Therefore, a regular audit program is needed for planning effective infertility treatment and improving pregnancy outcomes. Aims and Objectives: The main objective of this study was to identify the crucial predicting factors that can influence the IUI success. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 800 IUI cycles done from January, 2013 to August, 2017 in 651 couples with various etiologies of infertility. The common etiologies included female factor of ovulatory dysfunction, tubal, endocrinal, male factor, male and female factors combined, and unexplained factors. Ovulation induction was done either by clomiphene citrate (CC) alone or in combination of CC with gonadotropins or pure gonadotropins only. Human chorionic gonadotropin trigger was given when at least one dominant follicle measuring ≥18 mm with an endometrial thickness of >7 mm was obtained. IUI was done post 36 h of trigger. The double-density gradient method was the preferred method of sperm preparation. Results: In 800 cycles in corresponding 651 couples, the total outcome was 113 pregnancies (14.1%) per cycle with overall pregnancy rate (PR) per couple of 17.3%. The highest PR was observed in the patient with ovulatory dysfunction (21.2%), followed by patients with combined factor (15.1%) and male factor (14.7%). In the study, a higher PR was achieved in the female ≤25 years (18.9%) P < 0.04 with significant findings with duration of infertility ≤5 years (15.1%) having primary infertility (14.5%) with low body mass index <25 (14.1%). IUI success rate was highest in the first cycle (14.6%) followed by second cycle (14.0%) and third cycle (3.5%). Conclusion: IUI audit enables the characterization of prognostic factors to achieve improved PR. This study identifies the factors that can predict improved pregnancy outcome in women age ≤25 years and endometrium thickness between 9 and 11 mm. We also recommend IUI as a first line of infertility treatment for couples in low-income setting provided the women age and duration of infertility are acceptably low.


Keywords: Audit, clinical pregnancy rate, controlled ovarian stimulation, intrauterine insemination, pregnancy rate


How to cite this article:
Wadhwa L, Fauzdar A, Wadhwa SN. An intrauterine insemination audit at tertiary care hospital: A 4½ years' retrospective analysis of 800 intrauterine insemination cycles. J Hum Reprod Sci 2018;11:279-85

How to cite this URL:
Wadhwa L, Fauzdar A, Wadhwa SN. An intrauterine insemination audit at tertiary care hospital: A 4½ years' retrospective analysis of 800 intrauterine insemination cycles. J Hum Reprod Sci [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 10];11:279-85. Available from: http://www.jhrsonline.org/text.asp?2018/11/3/279/245872





   Introduction Top


Infertility is defined as failure to achieve the clinical pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse.[1] It has been reported that infertility or subfertility affects around 8%–12% of couples worldwide and that includes 40%–50% due to male factor either solely (20%) or in combination with the female factor (30%–40%), and another 30%–40% are idiopathic or unexplained.[2],[3],[4] An exhaustive workup is required for both the partners to arrive at a decision to choose the best assisted reproductive technology (ART), whether the couple should go for intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). IUI is one of the simplest techniques of ART for treating infertility by artificial insemination.

The rationale behind IUI is to increase the gamete density of both oocyte and sperms at the site of fertilization. Nevertheless, artificial insemination with husband's semen remains a widely used treatment option for many couples. There are various clinical indications for IUI that includes couples with cervical factor subfertility, unilateral tubal defect, ovulatory dysfunction, unexplained infertility, physiologic or psychological sexual dysfunction, immunological infertility, and suboptimal semen parameters as per the WHO 2010 standards.[5] This therapy is relatively minimally invasive and an uncomplicated procedure. IUI involves the processing of semen sample in the laboratory to yield active sperms devoid of seminal plasma, which are then directly placed into the uterus. There are various semen preparation techniques such as density gradient, swim-up, and simple wash techniques that are utilized for separation of human spermatozoa from seminal plasma. The final processed semen sample contains high percentage of progressively motile and morphologically normal sperms free from debris, nongerm cells, and dead spermatozoa.

It is essential to do regular monitoring of each IUI cycles for all the variables including female, male, and techniques-related factors influencing the success rate. Then, there could be certain interventions that can be preferred before planning for new cycles to get the maximum benefits for the patients. There are many variables that could influence the success rates of IUI treatment. Hence, it is very important to monitor each cycle and document all the factors by doing audit on monthly basis for improving the pregnancy outcomes. The statistics obtained after analyzing all the IUI cycles on monthly/quarterly basis can be further presented to the entire infertility unit for planning an effective treatment protocol with necessary clinical and laboratory interventions. The present study is a retrospective analysis done as part of an audit of 4 ½ years of IUI practice of 800 cycles at a tertiary care hospital. The main objective of this study was to identify the predictive factors that can influence the IUI success with improved pregnancy outcome.


   Materials and Methods Top


This is a retrospective analysis of 800 IUI cycles done in between January 2013 and August 2017 on 651 couples. A basic infertility workup was performed before starting controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) that included detailed medical history, physical examination, transvaginal ultrasonography, hormone study, hysterosalpingogram, and semen analysis. The hormonal study, including follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol (E2), prolactin, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) on the second day of menstrual cycle was done. Male factor was categorized based on the semen analysis reported as per the WHO manual 5th edition standards. Based on the semen analysis, the sample was characterized as normozoospermia (≥15 million/ml), oligozoospermia (≤15 million/ml) or azoospermia (no sperms), and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) were classified as follows: mild OAT (total motility of sperm [TMS] >10–15 million); moderate OAT (TMS 5–10 million); and severe OAT (1–5 million sperm).

All the women planned for IUI cycles underwent COS protocol between the 2nd and 5th day of the cycle. OS was done with clomiphene citrate (CC) alone or combination of CC with human menopausal gonadotropins (HMG) or pure gonadotropin cycle using recombinant FSH dosages 75–150 IU. The most frequent starting dose of CC was 50–150 mg/day. The dose of the drug was adjusted according to each patient's characteristics, especially age, body mass index (BMI), previous ovarian response, and ovarian reserve. Ovarian functions were evaluated on day 2 by serum concentration level of FSH (IU/L), LH (IU/L), and E2 (pg/ml). A baseline ultrasound scan on day 2 of the menstrual cycle was done to assess the antral follicle count (AFC), size of follicles and endometrial thickness (ET). In female, endocrinological factors were also considered such as hypothyroid with elevated level of TSH ≥3 IU/L and serum prolactin ≥25 ng/ml causing hyperprolactinemia. Regular follicular monitoring was done through ultrasound after start of COS cycle to evaluate ovarian response. Ovulation was triggered by intramuscular injection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 10,000 IU when at least one dominant follicle ≥18 mm and an ET >7 mm was obtained. IUI was done after 36 h of trigger injection.

The sample preparation was done within 1 h of collection of semen sample after 2 days of abstinence. Frozen donor semen samples were procured from ART bank for all donor cycles for the treatment of male factor. The semen sample was washed to free from seminal fluid through double-density gradient (45% and 90%) protocol, and total sperm concentration (TSC) and TMS of the processed sample was determined before insemination. A 15-cm soft catheter was used for IUI insemination. The proximal end of the catheter was introduced in the uterine cavity, and 0.5 ml of prepared semen sample was slowly injected over about 15 s. Post-IUI luteal phase support was provided by prescribing natural micronized progesterone 200 mg twice a day administrated vaginally starting on the night of insemination and continued until the pregnancy test. If pregnancy occurred, administration continued until the 12th week of gestation.

All the patient-related information and variable factors were captured daily in Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, and analysis was done using the statistical package for social sciences IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.00, IBM, Armonk, NY, United States of America. Categorical variables were presented in number and percentage (%). Qualitative variables were correlated using the Chi-square test/Fishers exact test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to find significant factors of positive pregnancy after adjusting for confounding factors. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


   Results Top


In the analyzed 800 cycles corresponding to 651 couples between 2013 and August, 2017, the outcome was 113 pregnancies with pregnancy rate (PR) per cycle (14.1%) and the PR per couple of 17.3%. There were various etiologies for doing IUI with husband and donor semen sample. The female factors and male factors were detected in 213 (33%) and 91 (14%) of the cases, respectively. There were 86 (13%) women that showed both female and male factors, i.e., combined factor, and the remaining 261 (40%) of patients were categorized into unexplained factor of etiology with no other reason observed for infertility [Figure 1]. The highest PR was observed in the patient with ovulatory dysfunction (21.2%) followed by patients with combined factor (15.1%) than in male factor (14.7%) and unexplained infertility (11.8%). In total, there were 149 donor cycles with positive pregnancy in 22 (PR - 14.7%) [Table 1].
Figure 1: Different etiologies for infertility

Click here to view
Table 1: Distribution of etiologies of infertility with corresponding pregnancy rate

Click here to view


The mean age of the participants was 27 years (range, 19–39 years), and the mean BMI was 23 (range 18–26). The PR per cycle for the female age of ≤25 years was 18.9% (P < 0.04) compared to higher age groups with gradual decline in PR with increased age groups [Table 2]. In the majority of cycles (97.8%), the women had a BMI between 18.5 and <24.9 with PR of 14.1% the remaining cycles (2.2%) with BMI 25–35 achieved a PR of 11.7% with nonsignificant results (P > 0.05). Infertility was primary and secondary in 72.3% and 27.6% of the cases, respectively. The mean duration of infertility was 5.03 ± 3.27 years (range 1–17 years). The PR achieved decreased in line with years of infertility [Table 2].
Table 2: Demographic factors affecting the pregnancy outcome in intrauterine insemination cycles including age, body mass index, type, and duration of infertility

Click here to view


The female infertility factors were contributed in 213 (33%) patients which were further classified into ovulatory dysfunction 106 (16%), tubal 52 (8%), endocrinological 55 (9%), and unexplained in 261 (40%) of women. Among the female factor, the highest PR was obtained in the patient with ovulatory dysfunction (21.2%), followed by endocrinal (13.4%) and lowest in tubal factor (11.5%). Ovarian reserves were evaluated on day 2, and the mean value of serum concentration of FSH was 6.94 ± 2.59 IU/L; LH 6.76 ± 2.95 IU/L; and E2 49.36 ± 30.78 pg/ml with AFC of 10.47 ± 1.53. The higher PR of 12.6%(101) was observed in women with good ovarian reserve (FSH ≤10 IU/L) as compared to poor responders with elevated FSH concentration with PR of 1.5% (12) with nonsignificant results (P > 0.05). Similarly, higher PR of 12.8% (103) was achieved in women LH ≤10 IU/L as compared to poor responders with elevated LH concentration with PR of 1.25% (10) with nonsignificant findings. The estradiol value on the 2nd day of the cycle within the range of ≤80 pg/ml was observed with PR of 13.3% (107) cycles and PR of 0.75% (6) with elevated concentration with nonsignificant results (P > 0.05).

The PR/cycle was maintained between 14.0% and 14.6% and was observed until the second cycle, after which the rate decreased noticeably from the third cycle onward (3.5%) [Table 3]. In the majority of the cycles, 533 (66.6%) CC was administered for ovulation induction with PR of 81/533 (15.1%). This was followed by another 219 (27.3%) cycles with both CC and HMG achieved a PR of 12.7% lower than pure CC cycle with nonsignificant results (P > 0.05). There were very few cycles of letrozole and tamoxifen along with gonadotropins with no positive pregnancies [Table 4]. There were two or more dominant follicles of more than 18 mm in 300 (37.5%) cycles and achieved a higher PR (15%) as compared to single dominant follicle PR (13.6%) with nonsignificant results. The mean ET of 8.42 ± 1.69 mm was observed on day of hCG trigger. The highest PR of 17% was achieved within ET of ≥9.1–11 mm followed by ET of 7–9 mm and ET ≤7 mm with significant findings (P < 0.04) [Table 4].
Table 3: Details of positive pregnancies (pregnancy rate percentage) per intrauterine insemination cycle

Click here to view
Table 4: Effect of different stimulation protocols, number of dominant follicles, and endometrium thickness on day of human chorionic gonadotropin trigger as technique related factor contributing in pregnancy success

Click here to view


IUI was performed with average of 35.62 ± 17.28 million/ml total motile spermatozoa count and with total motility (%) of 56.81 ± 10.73. In 723 cycles, the postwash total motile spermatozoa count of ≥15 million/ml was observed with positive and biochemical PR in 102 (14.1%) cycles and PR subsequently decreased with fall in total spermatozoa count [Table 5]. The multivariate analysis was used to determine whether there was an association between pregnancy and the predictors that were found to be significant. Women with age ≤25 years have 0.44 times (odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–5.0 times) more chance of getting pregnant than the women at higher age group. It was also observed from data that increase in ET on day of hCG trigger after adjusting for age has significantly higher chances of positive pregnancy in women with ET ≥9.1–11 mm and were 2.4 times more likely to become pregnant than the women with ET ≤7 mm (OR 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1–5.0 times) [Table 6].
Table 5: Effect of postprocessed semen parameters inseminated during intrauterine insemination on the pregnancy rates

Click here to view
Table 6: Multivariate analysis done to determine possible association between significant predictors including age of the patient and endometrium thickness on day of trigger

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


In this present analysis, the woman's age significantly affected the PR (P < 0.05). The PR of 18.9% per cycle was observed for women age ≤25 years and was 9.0% for the women ≥35 years of age. Whereas there are some studies that have reported that with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation age did not affect the PR provided the woman age was <40 years achieving PR of 13.7% per cycle and a rate of 4.1% thereafter.[6],[7] However, other researchers consider age to be an important factor in achieving pregnancy as observed in this present study.[8],[9] In our analysis, it was observed that BMI nonsignificantly affected the PR in women, although BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 could achieve a higher PR (14.1%) than women with a BMI ≥25 (11.7%). In a systematic review, PR of 13.0% was reported for BMI ≥35 and 7.84% for BMI between <18.5 and 24.9 with no significant difference among groups.[10] Studies have pointed out the impact of weight loss and lifestyle-related changes before becoming pregnant as key factors in the treatment of infertility.[11],[12],[13] There are also contradictory studies that have found no differences for weight, although they did observe that higher gonadotropin doses were necessary for OS in obese women.[14]

One of the important factors to assess as a predictor of pregnancy in response to IUI is the duration of infertility. There are number of studies that have reported higher PRs corresponding to shorter duration of infertility.[15],[16] In this retrospectively analysis, a nonsignificant difference was observed (P = 0.446) with a higher PR of 15.1% in infertility ≤5 years group compared to the duration of infertility with 5–10 years. Other studies have reported significant differences with infertility period with more and <6 years (6.1% vs. 14.2%).[6],[8] It was observed that PR falls as the duration of infertility increases suggesting that other ART such as IVF/ICSI should be used for the longer duration of infertility.

The hormone analysis on day 2 of the cycle is the main method for evaluating ovarian reserve. Cycle day 3 FSH and E2 levels are popular screening tools for predicting success in IVF. In our study, we found a higher PR of 12.6% with FSH levels ≤10 IU/L as compared to higher levels of ≥10 IU/L (P = 0.588). In general, higher FSH and E2 (>15 IU/L and >80 pg/ml, respectively) levels are considered strong predictors of poor IVF outcomes. Various studies by different authors had supported that higher levels of FSH reduces the number of follicles and ultimately affects the oocyte quality and thus predicting an unfavorable prognosis for infertility treatment.[17],[18],[19] In a retrospective analysis of 806 patients undergoing 1875 IUI cycles reported by Mullin et al.[20] observed that day 3 FSH and E2 levels cannot be used as markers to predict PR. In the present study, the PR per cycle was highest for the patients of ovulatory dysfunction achieved highest PR (18.8%) followed by combined factor PR (15.1%). It is evident that COS corrects ovulatatory dysfunction, therefore, results in a higher PR. The PR was higher (14.2%) in euthyroid patients with TSH ≤3.0 mIU/L with nonsignificant difference with other group with TSH >3. Studies have also reported that euthyroid patients, with preconception TSH values in the high-normal range (between 2.5 and 4.9 mIU/L) are not associated with adverse IUI outcomes.[21]

In the present analysis in all IUI cycles, double-density gradient method was the only preferred method for semen sample processing with overall observed PR of 14.1%. In a Cochrane review on sperm preparation techniques, it was concluded that there were insufficient randomized studies to choose the best method. However, density gradient centrifugation method showed to be superior to the swim-up and simple wash technique with a clear improvement of morphological normal spermatozoa with Grade A motility and normal DNA integrity.[22] In the present study, using donor sperm in cases of azoospermia resulted in PR of 14.7%. One pregnancy was obtained out of six IUI cycles with TSC of 1–5 millions/ml. Studies have shown that in patients with OAT the PR decreased in line with the severity of semen parameters including TSC and motility.[23] Sakhel et al. reported a direct relationship between sperm count and poor sperm motility with the PR.[24] It has been reported that PRs are lower if prewash count is <10 million/ml.[25] In a Cochrane review, it was clearly shown that there is insufficient evidence to conclude whether IUI is effective or not in moderate and mild male factor infertility.[26] In the present study, there was no identifiable cause of infertility in 40% of the couples labeled as unexplained infertility. In these cases, the PR per cycle was 11.8% in CC cycle alone or in combination with HMG. Similar to this study meta-analysis showed that the combination of OS with gonadotropins and IUI significantly improves live-birth rates in couples with unexplained infertility.[27] Few studies have achieved a PR of 15% in unexplained infertility after stimulation by gonadotropins.[28]

In this study, the mean number of IUIs per couple was 1.2. Over 97.3% of pregnancies occurred in the initial two cycles (14.6%), with the PR dropping noticeably from the third cycle (3.5%). In a study with 811 cycles observed that the highest PR occurred in the first cycle and that 97% of all pregnancies occurred within four cycles.[6] In our study, the number of preovulatory dominant follicles recruited was not a significant predictor of pregnancy though the PR was slightly higher (15% vs. 13.6%) as compared to single recruited follicle. There are studies that found the recruitment of at least two follicles increased success rates in COS in combination with IUI by 2% for one follicle, and by 15% for two or more follicles significantly.[29],[30] Another study in 9963 cycles showed PRs of 7.6% for one follicle, 10.1% for two follicles, 8.6% for three follicles, and 14% for four follicles.[6],[31]

In the majority, 66.6% of the cycle's CC was administered for ovulation induction with PR of 15.1%. In 27.3% cycles, both CC and HMG were used for superovulation giving lower PR as compared to pure CC cycle, i.e., 12.7%. It was further observed that IUI has low dropout rate, low risk for OHSS (ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome), and a low multiple PR in natural cycles and CC or low-dose HMG OS protocols.[32] There were total ten cycles with pure gonadotropin cycle and yielded two positive pregnancies. It seems that higher PRs result when gonadotropins are primarily used.[33],[34] However, studies have reported higher PRs for the HMG rather than the recombinant FSH products.[35] In this study, no significant difference in PRs was found using different stimulation protocols used. In this study, OS protocol was mild by giving CC (CC, 50–100 mg/day for 5 days) and it remained the first-choice drug. Contrary to gonadotrophins, CC is easily available, easy to use, and less costly.


   Conclusion Top


This study is aimed at identifying factors that predict pregnancy following IUI, and it was found that the probability of clinical PR was greatest for women with age ≤25 years with a duration of infertility <5 years having a ET between 9 and 11 mm at the time of trigger. The PR was higher in women with FSH value on day 3 of cycle below 10 IU/L and also in women anovulation as a factor of infertility. According to our results, the “ideal” stimulation protocol is with CC to induce ovarian response. We recommend IUI as a first-line treatment for couples in low-income setting provided the woman's age, and the duration of infertility are low. It is further proposed to perform at least three IUI cycles and proceed to in vitro fertilization along with complex-ART, if pregnancy did not occur.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1520-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Nelson DR, Nada EA, El-Tonsy MH, Alvarez JG, et al. Increased sperm nuclear DNA damage in normozoospermic infertile men: A prospective study. Fertil Steril 2002;78:313-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Nallella KP, Sharma RK, Aziz N, Agarwal A. Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril 2006;85:629-34.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Greenhall E, Vessey M. The prevalence of subfertility: A review of the current confusion and a report of two new studies. Fertil Steril 1990;54:978-83.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 2010;16:231-45.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tomas C, Bloigu R, Tuomivaara L, Martikainen H. Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: An analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod 1999;14:698-703.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Brzechffa PR, Daneshmand S, Buyalos RP. Sequential clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin with intrauterine insemination: The effect of patient age on clinical outcome. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2110-4.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP, Schats R, Rutten FF, Schoemaker J. Intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: A randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 2000;355:13-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Demir B, Dilbaz B, Cinar O, Karadag B, Tasci Y, Kocak M, et al. Factors affecting pregnancy outcome of intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with favourable female characteristics. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;31:420-3.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Veltman-Verhulst SM, Hughes E, Ayeleke RO, Cohlen BJ. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;2:CD001838.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Hassan MA, Killick SR. Negative lifestyle is associated with a significant reduction in fecundity. Fertil Steril 2004;81:384-92.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Clark AM, Thornley B, Tomlinson L, Galletley C, Norman RJ. Weight loss in obese infertile women results in improvement in reproductive outcome for all forms of fertility treatment. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1502-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Pasquali R, Antenucci D, Casimirri F, Venturoli S, Paradisi R, Fabbri R, et al. Clinical and hormonal characteristics of obese amenorrheic hyperandrogenic women before and after weight loss. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1989;68:173-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Dodson WC, Kunselman AR, Legro RS. The effect of obesity on treatment outcomes for infertile ovulatory women undergoing superovulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2005;84 Suppl 1:S72-3.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Collins JA, Burrows EA, Wilan AR. The prognosis for live birth among untreated infertile couples. Fertil Steril 1995;64:22-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Snick HK, Snick TS, Evers JL, Collins JA. The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples: The Walcheren primary care study. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1582-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Buyalos RP, Daneshmand S, Brzechffa PR. Basal estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone predict fecundity in women of advanced reproductive age undergoing ovulation induction therapy. Fertil Steril 1997;68:272-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Navot D, Bergh PA, Williams MA, Garrisi GJ, Guzman I, Sandler B, et al. Poor oocyte quality rather than implantation failure as a cause of age-related decline in female fertility. Lancet 1991;337:1375-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ahmed Ebbiary NA, Lenton EA, Salt C, Ward AM, Cooke ID. The significance of elevated basal follicle stimulating hormone in regularly menstruating infertile women. Hum Reprod 1994;9:245-52.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Mullin CM, Trivax B, Baxter M, Virji N, Saketos M, San Roman G. Day 3 follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol (E2): Could these values be used as markers to predict pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing ovulation induction (OI) therapy with intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles? Fertil Steril 2005;84 Suppl 1:S162.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Karmon AE, Batsis M, Chavarro JE, Souter I. Preconceptional thyroid-stimulating hormone levels and outcomes of intrauterine insemination among euthyroid infertile women. Fertil Steril 2015;103:258-630.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Boomsma CM, Heineman MJ, Cohlen BJ, Farquhar C. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4:CD004507.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Dorjpurev U, Kuwahara A, Yano Y, Taniguchi T, Yamamoto Y, Suto A, et al. Effect of semen characteristics on pregnancy rate following intrauterine insemination. J Med Invest 2011;58:127-33.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Sakhel K, Abozaid T, Schwark S, Ashraf M, Abuzeid M. Semen parameters as determinants of success in 1662 cycles of intrauterine insemination after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 2005;84 Suppl 1:S248-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Van Voorhis BJ, Barnett M, Sparks AE, Syrop CH, Rosenthal G, Dawson J, et al. Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2001;75:661-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Bensdorp AJ, Cohlen BJ, Heineman MJ, Vandekerckhove P. Intra-uterine insemination for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;3:CD000360.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Hughes EG. The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: A meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1865-72.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Verhulst SM, Cohlen BJ, Hughes E, Te Velde E, Heineman MJ. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;4:CD001838.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Bagis T, Haydardedeoglu B, Kilicdag EB, Cok T, Simsek E, Parlakgumus AH. Single versus double intrauterine insemination in multi-follicular ovarian hyperstimulation cycles: A randomized trial. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1684-90.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Plosker SM, Jacobson W, Amato P. Predicting and optimizing success in an intra-uterine insemination programme. Hum Reprod 1994;9:2014-21.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Stone BA, Vargyas JM, Ringler GE, Stein AL, Marrs RP. Determinants of the outcome of intrauterine insemination: Analysis of outcomes of 9963 consecutive cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:1522-34.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Ombelet W, Campo R, Bosmans E, Nijs M. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) as a first-line treatment in developing countries and methodological aspects that might influence IUI success. Hum Reprod 2008;23 Suppl 1:64-72.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Gerli S, Bini V, Di Renzo GC. Cost-effectiveness of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus human FSH in intrauterine insemination cycles: A statistical model-derived analysis. Gynecol Endocrinol 2008;24:18-23.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Demirol A, Gurgan T. Comparison of different gonadotrophin preparations in intrauterine insemination cycles for the treatment of unexplained infertility: A prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod 2007;22:97-100.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Balasch J, Miró F, Burzaco I, Casamitjana R, Civico S, Ballescá JL, et al. The role of luteinizing hormone in human follicle development and oocyte fertility: Evidence from in vitro fertilization in a woman with long-standing hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism and using recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1678-83.  Back to cited text no. 35
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
             

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (634 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed110    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded22    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal