|Year : 2012 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 258-261
Correlation of technical difficulty during embryo transfer with rate of clinical pregnancy
Neeta Singh, Prerna Gupta, Suneeta Mittal, Neena Malhotra
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
|Date of Web Publication||22-Jan-2013|
104, Type 3 Quarters, Ayurvigyan Nagar, Near Ansal Plaza, New Delhi - 110049
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Aim: To correlate the ease or difficulty of embryo transfer and blood at catheter tip with pregnancy rate when embryo transfer (ET) was performed by the same operator using soft catheter. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 342 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization or ICSI cycle from January 2008 to December 2010 in a single centre was done. The type of transfer was divided into two groups: 'easy' or 'difficult'. Transfer was considered difficult when additional instrumentation was required or firmer catheter was used or required changing of catheter. Patients undergoing cryo-preserved ET were excluded from the study. Results: On the day of transfer in 284 (83%) patients, ET was easy and difficulty was encountered in 58 (17%) patients. Blood at catheter was seen in 101 (29.53%) patients. In the group of 58 difficult transfers, 10 pregnancies resulted with a clinical pregnancy rate of 17.2%, while 67 pregnancies resulted in 284 cycles of easy transfer with clinical pregnancy rate of 23.6% (P value = 0.045). While no significant difference was seen in pregnancies with blood on outer catheter and blood less transfer, there was significant reduction in pregnancy rate when blood was present on catheter tip compared to bloodless transfer (13.3% v/s 24.1; P value = 0.032). Conclusion: Reduction in clinical pregnancy rate is seen with difficult ETs, more when blood is present at the catheter tip.
Keywords: Clinical pregnancy rate, difficult embryo transfer, embryo transfer, in vitro fertilization, mock transfer
|How to cite this article:|
Singh N, Gupta P, Mittal S, Malhotra N. Correlation of technical difficulty during embryo transfer with rate of clinical pregnancy. J Hum Reprod Sci 2012;5:258-61
|How to cite this URL:|
Singh N, Gupta P, Mittal S, Malhotra N. Correlation of technical difficulty during embryo transfer with rate of clinical pregnancy. J Hum Reprod Sci [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 Jun 4];5:258-61. Available from: http://www.jhrsonline.org/text.asp?2012/5/3/258/106337
| Introduction|| |
Embryo transfer (ET) is the final and critical step in the long pathway of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Despite recent advances in IVF, many controversies surround the procedure of ET. 
Type of catheter used, ultrasound guidance versus clinical touch, trial transfer, easy or difficult transfer all have been variously studied to determine affect on pregnancy rate. Although implantation failure might be due to poor embryo quality or suboptimal endometrial quality, the ET technique is an important determinant.
Traditionally it has been thought that with increased manipulation required in ET, chances of pregnancy reduce. Also, 'blood at catheter tip' as a marker of difficult ET has been thought to be associated with reduced pregnancy rates. It has been said that with use of vulsellum there is release of oxytocin, which stimulates uterine contractions. ,,,,,,, But in a few studies no correlation of difficult transfer has been seen with clinical pregnancy rate. ,
In this study, we aim to correlate the ease or difficulty of ET and blood at catheter tip with pregnancy rate when ET was performed by the same operator using soft catheter.
| Materials and Methods|| |
A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent IVF or ICSI cycle from January 2008 to December 2010 in a single center was done. The type of transfer was divided into two groups: 'easy' or 'difficult'. Transfer was considered difficult when additional instrumentation was required or firmer catheter was used or required changing of catheter. Patients undergoing cryo-preserved ET were excluded from the study.
Two main protocols were used for controlled ovarian hyper stimulation: the long agonist protocol and short antagonist protocol. In the long agonist protocol, pituitary desensitization with daily Subcutaneous (SC) administration of 1 mg leuprolide acetate (lupride 4, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Gujarat, India) began in the mid-luteal phase of the previous menstrual cycle. This dose was continued until ovarian quiescence was confirmed by ultrasound examination in next menstruation, and estradiol values of less than 50 pg/ ml and luteinizing hormone (LH), less than 2 mIU/ml. After which the dose of leupride was halved and stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) (Gonal F, Merck Serono, Germany) was started until the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection. In the short antagonist protocol, patients were scanned on second day of period to confirm quiescence and no ovarian cysts. Ovarian stimulation was initiated on second day of menstrual flow with recombinant FSH. A daily dose of 0.25 mg of GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide; Serono Laboratories, Germany) administration was initiated on day 6 of stimulation. Dosage of recombinant FSH was decided based on patient's age, antral follicle count, basal hormonal levels and response to previous stimulation. Dosages were adjusted according to response seen on vaginal ultrasound examination. Human chorionic gonadotropin (Ovitrelle; Serono Laboratories, Germany) was administered SC when at least two leading follicles reached a mean diameter R18 mms. Trans-vaginal oocyte retrieval was scheduled 36 hours later. Injectible progesterone 100 mg is started from the next day of pick up and continued till the day of pregnancy test. Embryo transfer (EET) was performed 2 to 3 or 5 to 6 days after oocyte retrieval via the vaginal route.
Technique of ET
A mock ET was done in all patients before recruiting patient for IVF cycle. During mock transfer, ease of transfer, need for instrumentation, direction of uterine cavity whether anteverted or retroverted was noted. On the day of ET, patient was asked to come with full bladder. Cooks soft catheter was used for ET in all patients and all transfers were done by single personnel with patient in lithotomy position. No anesthesia was used for the procedure. Under sterile condition, vaginal parts were cleaned with saline and draped and cusco speculum inserted to expose cervix. Cervical mucus was aspirated and cervix cleaned with sterile media. Cooks catheter was used for ET in all patients and all transfers were done by single personnel with patient in lithotomy position. The embryos were deposited in region of mid-portion of uterine cavity under ultrasound guidance [Figure 1]. In all cases, the catheter was left in situ for 30-60 seconds and then withdrawn gently avoiding negative pressure. It was then checked under a dissecting microscope for retained embryos. If these were found, they were reloaded and transferred again (repeat transfer). The patients were asked to remain in bed for 15-30 min. ET was considered difficult when additional instrumentation was required or firmer catheter was used or required changing of catheter. Intramuscular micronized progesterone was continued for 15 days and b-hcg was done after 2 weeks.
SPSS version 10 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for data analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The chi-square test, the Fisher's exact test, and the chi-square test for independence for more than two groups were used to compare qualitative variables, and the Student's t-test to compare quantitative variables, as appropriate.
| Results|| |
Three hundred and forty two IVF cycles or ICSI from our IVF database were studied. The mean age of the patient was 31.6 3.98 years (range 24-45 years). In the pre-stimulation mock ET done in all patients, ET was easy in 268 patients and in 74 patients ET was difficult. For cases in which mock transfer was difficult due to cervical stenosis, dilation of the cervix was done before starting down-regulation or in the previous cycle. On the day of transfer, ET was easy in 284 (83%) patients and difficulty was encountered in 58 (17%) patients. The reduced incidence of difficult transfer at actual ET might be due to prior cervical dilation and also because of uterus becoming ante-verted as heavy stimulated ovaries sunk in the Pouch of douglas (POD). Blood at catheter was seen in 101 (29.53%) patients. An overall total of 77 pregnancies resulted with a clinical pregnancy rate of 22.51% in 342 cycles. A total of 950 embryos were transferred with a mean of 2.7 embryos transferred in each cycle.
[Table 1] shows the cycle characteristics in group of difficult and easy transfer while [Table 2] shows the differences between bloodless transfer and blood at catheter tip. In the group of 58 difficult transfers, 10 pregnancies resulted with a clinical pregnancy rate of 17.2%, while 67 pregnancies resulted in 284 cycles with clinical pregnancy rate of 23.6%. This difference did reach statistical significance (P value = 0.045). The difficulties encountered were difficulty in negotiation of cervix, use of vulsellum or required changing of catheter.
|Table 1: Shows cycle characteristics between two groups of easy and difficult transfer |
Click here to view
|Table 2: Characteristics of cycle between bloodless transfers and transfers with blood at outer catheter or catheter tip |
Click here to view
Blood on catheter was seen in 101 (29.53%) patients. Out of these 101 patients, in 71 patients blood was seen on catheter wall while it was seen on catheter tip in 30 patients. A total of 19 pregnancies occurred (Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) = 18.81%) in this sub-group with 15 pregnancies seen in patients with blood on catheter wall (CPR 21.12%) and 4 pregnancies in patients with blood on catheter tip (CPR = 13.33%). In patients with blood less transfer, 58 pregnancies occurred with clinical pregnancy rate of 24.1%. While no significant difference was seen in pregnancies with blood on outer catheter and blood less transfer, there was significant reduction in pregnancy rate when blood was present on catheter tip compared to bloodless transfer (13.3% vs 24.1; P value = 0.032)
| Discussion|| |
An ET is considered successful when embryos are delivered a-traumatically to the site of maximal implantation in the uterus. It has generally been considered that chances of pregnancy are reduced if extra manipulation is required during ET. There have been reports both supporting as well as confounding this fact. In this study, we aimed to find whether difficult ET and blood at catheter tip are associated with reduced pregnancy rates.
We found that chances of pregnancy are reduced in a case of difficult transfer or when blood is present at catheter tip. This finding is similar to study by Sallam et al.  in which blood at catheter tip was associated with reduced pregnancy rates. However, no difference was seen when transfer was difficult or extra manipulation like use of volsellum or cervical dilation was required.
In a large retrospective study by Tomas et al.  in which a total of 4807 ET were studied, easy or intermediate transfers were associated with 1.7 fold increased pregnancy rate then difficult transfers (P value < 0.0001). Increased manipulation or touching of the fundus during difficult transfers might stimulate uterine contraction reducing CPR.
The role of mock transfers in reducing difficult ETs has been controversial. Mock Transfer can be done at the time of start of ovarian stimulation or at oocytes retrieval or at the time of actual transfer. In the initial studies by Mansour et al.,  trial transfers have been shown to reduce the incidence of difficult transfers. However in a study by Henne et al.,  it has been shown that uterine length and position changes with ovarian stimulation challenging the role of trial transfer. In the present study, mock transfers were done in all patients before ovarian stimulation.
The success of ET also depends on the operator as seen in the study by Hearns-Stokes et al.  in which clinical pregnancy rate varied significantly with the clinician performing the embryo transfer. In the present study all embryo transfers were done by a single clinician, hence eliminating this confounding factor.
The next most important factor considered is the role of ultrasound guidance.  Ultrasound guidance helps in depositing embryos a-traumatically to the mid-portion of the uterus without touching the fundus. A meta-analysis of 17 Randomized controlled trials (RCT) studies conducted by Cochrane  comparing ultrasound vs. clinical touch showed increased pregnancy rate with ultrasound guidance. In the present study, all ETs were done under ultrasound guidance.
To conclude, all efforts should be made to reduce difficult transfers. Difficult transfer and blood at catheter tip are associated with reduced CPR. In case of difficulty encountered during transfer a stepwise approach with minimal endometrial trauma should be used.There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
|1.||Mains L, Voorhis BJ. Optimizing the technique of embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2010;94:785-90. |
|2.||Nabi A, Awonuga A, Birch H, Barlow S, Stewart B. Multiple attempts at embryo transfer: Does this affect in-vitro fertilization treatment outcome? Hum Reprod 1997;12:1188-90. |
|3.||Abusheikha N, Lass A, Akagbosu F, Brinsden P. How useful is cervical dilatation in patients with cervical stenosis who are participating in an in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program? The Bourn Hall experience. Fertil Steril 1999;72:610-2. |
|4.||Dorn C, Reinsberg J, Schlebusch H, Prietl G, van der Ven H, Krebs D. Serum oxytocin concentration during embryo transfer procedure. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;87:77-80. |
|5.||Lesny P, Killick SR, Robinson J, RavenG, Maguiness SD. Junctional zone contractions and embryo transfer: Is it safe to use a tenaculum? Hum Reprod 1999;14:2367-70. |
|6.||Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Taylor S, de Ziegler D, Frydman R. Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1968-74. |
|7.||Goudas VT, Hammitt DG, Damario MA, Session DR, Singh AP, Dumesic DA. Blood on the embryo transfer catheter is assocaited with decreased rates of embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy with the use of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1998;70:878-8. |
|8.||Lass A, Abusheikha N, Brinsden P, Kovacs GT. The effect of a difficult embryo transfer on the outcome of IVF. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2417. |
|9.||Garzo VG. Embryo transfer technique. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:117- 22. |
|10.||Burke LM, Davenport AT, Russell GB, Deaton JL. Predictors of success after embryo transfer: Experience from a single provider. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1001-4. |
|11.||Tur-Kaspa I, Yuval Y, Bider D, Levron J, Shulman A, Dor J. Difficult or repeated sequential embryo transfers do not adversely affect in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates or outcome. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2452-5. |
|12.||Sallam HN, Agameya AF, Rahman AF, Ezzeldin F, Sallam AN. Impact of technical difficulties, choice of catheter, and the presence of blood on the success of embryotransfer-experience from a single provider. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003;20:135-42. |
|13.||Tomas C, Tikkinen K, Tuomivaaara L, Tapanqinen JS, Martikainen H. The degree of difficulty of embryo transfer is an independent factor for predicting pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2002;17;26-32. |
|14.||Mansour R, Aboulghar M, Serour G. Dummy embryo transfer: A technique that minimizes the problems of embryo transfer and improves the pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990;54:678-81. |
|15.||Henne MB, Milki AA. Uterine position at real embryo transfer compared with mock embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2004;19:570-2. |
|16.||Hearns-Stokes RM, Miller BT, Scott L, CreussD, Chakraborty PK, Segars JH. Pregnancy rates after embryo transfer depend on the provider at embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;74:80-6. |
|17.||Wood EG, Batzer FR, Go KJ, Gutmann JN, Corson SL. Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2000;15:107-12. |
|18.||Brown JA, Buckingham K, About-Setta A, BuckettW. Ultrasound versus "clinical touch" for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women [review]. The Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;20:CD006107. |
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Cervical mucus removal before embryo transfer in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
| ||Laurentiu Craciunas,Nikolaos Tsampras,Cheryl Fitzgerald |
| ||Fertility and Sterility. 2014; 101(5): 1302 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|