Journal of Human Reproductive Science
Home Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives
   Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size    Users online: 972


 
   Table of Contents     
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 17-19
 

Role of anti-human lymphocyte culture cytotoxic antibodies in recurrent spontaneous pregnancy loss women


National Institute of Immunohaematology, KEM Hospital Campus, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission24-Oct-2010
Date of Decision15-Dec-2010
Date of Acceptance29-Dec-2010
Date of Web Publication28-Jun-2011

Correspondence Address:
Shankarkumar Umapathy
National Institute of Immunohaematology,13th Floor, KEM Hospital,Parel, Mumbai - 400012, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.82354

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Background : Recurrent spontaneous pregnancy (RSA) is defined as a sequence of three or more consecutive spontaneous abortions. One of the major causes of RSA is immunological where alloimmune antibodies develop towards human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antigens. Earlier research had suggested that anti-HLA antibodies are produced in normal women; studies have been reported that normal pregnant women develop anti-HLA antibodies, mostly after 20-28 weeks of gestation. Aim : To evaluate the role of anti-HLA antibodies in RSA patients Materials and Methods : A total of 80 randomly selected couples with unexplained three or more RSA and control group of 50 normal pregnant women were screened for anti-HLA A and B antibodies. The anti-HLA antibodies were analyzed following the standard two-stage NIH microlymphocytotoxicity assay. Results : In our study group a high frequency of anti-HLA antibodies among women with RSA (26.25%) was detected compared to normal pregnant women (8.0%). Most of the sera showed HLA-A and HLA-B antibodies which had high titer, up to a dilution of 1: 4096. Conclusion : This incidence of high anti-HLA antibodies in RSA women during early weeks of gestation may explain the recurrent pregnancy loss.


Keywords: Anti-HLA antibodies, incidence, RSA


How to cite this article:
Umapathy S, Shankarkumar A, Ramrakhiyani V, Ghosh K. Role of anti-human lymphocyte culture cytotoxic antibodies in recurrent spontaneous pregnancy loss women. J Hum Reprod Sci 2011;4:17-9

How to cite this URL:
Umapathy S, Shankarkumar A, Ramrakhiyani V, Ghosh K. Role of anti-human lymphocyte culture cytotoxic antibodies in recurrent spontaneous pregnancy loss women. J Hum Reprod Sci [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Jul 22];4:17-9. Available from: http://www.jhrsonline.org/text.asp?2011/4/1/17/82354



   Introduction Top


Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) is defined as a sequence of three or more consecutive spontaneous abortion. RSA is a heterogeneous condition which may have many possible causes; more than one contributory factor can lead to recurrent pregnancy losses. The major causes of RSA are genetic, endocrinological, immunological, anatomical factors and yet can be unexplained with all these in some cases. In unexplained RSA, immunotherapy (allogenic leukocyte immunization from the partner) has been used to treat the couples.

Antibody to human leucocyte antigen (HLA) was first identified in the serum of a polytransfused patient; [1] subsequently materno-fetal alloimmunization was also shown to produce anti-HLA antibodies in pregnant women. [2],[3] Since then, pregnant women have been the most common source of these HLA antisera for routine HLA serological typing (though monoclonal antibodies have also been raised recently). [4]

The aim of this study is to identify the role of anti-HLA antibodies in RSA patients.


   Materials and Methods Top


A total of 80 randomly selected couples with unexplained three or more recurrent spontaneous abortion and control group of 50 pregnant women (age group 20 to 40 years) who had no previous abortions but had previous 1 or 2 pregnancies recruited in the 20-22 week of pregnancy.

All the women with RSA were found to be negative for cytogenetic and autoimmune abnormalities such as anti-phospholipid antibodies (APAs), antithyroid antibodies (ATAs), anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs), antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) and lupus antibodies (LA). Five to 10 ml of peripheral blood was obtained from each individual. The sera of women were investigated for the anti-HLA antibodies against their husband's lymphocyte. The anti-HLA antibodies were analyzed following the standard two stage NIH microlymphocytotoxicity assay. [5] These RSA patients on follow-up showed that they aborted the foetus while the normal females delivered a normal alive when they were followed up during their pregnancy.


   Result Top


The anti-HLA antibodies were tested in 80 RSA and 50 control couples [Table 1]. In RSA case, 21 sera (26.25%) versus 4 sera (8.0%) were found positive for HLA antibodies against husband's lymphocytes. Most of the sera showed HLA-A and HLA-B antibodies which had high titer. For screening, sixty well tissue typing tray consisted of one positive, one negative control, 21 positive sera of RSA women and 4 antenatal control sera. The antisera were serially diluted up to 1 : 4096 and tested for anti-HLA antibodies. A distinctive pattern of antibodies was obtained as tabulated below. The results indicated that 9 out of 21 (42.85%) (OR=2.25; etiological fraction=0.23) positive sera showed reaction at dilution 1 : 4096 and 5 sera (23.80%) showed reaction at dilution 1 : 2048. One each of positive sera showed no reaction at all the dilutions including neat samples used and positivity at neat sample, respectively. Few of the sera showed reaction at highest dilution only, but the same was not observed in the corresponding neat sample which indicates presence of very low amount of antibodies against HLA antigen. It is also observed that maximum positivity was for 1 : 8 dilution of all the sera used. In the case of normal controls, it was observed that only 1 out of 4 sera showed presence of antibodies at highest dilution while rest 3 sera tested showed variable results.
Table 1: HLA anti-bodies among the RSA patients on various serial dilutions

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Initially many studies have been done to determine whether or not there is a connection between RSA and couples who share HLA alleles. This alleles sharing hypothesis concerning RSA was first supported by Komlos and his associates. [6] Excess sharing of HLA antigens between spouses has been considered by some to be mechanism leading to maternal hyporesponsiveness to paternal antigens encountered in pregnancy and therefore subsequent miscarriage. [7] This hyporesponsiveness was considered to be shown by a lower incidence of anti-paternal antibody in RSA. [8]

Wide variation in the incidence of anti-HLA antibodies has been reported in the sera of normal pregnant women. These are due to variations in immunization and the resultant outcomes. Values range from 7.3% to 36% (7.3%, Swedish women; [9] 18.7%, Caucasian women; [10] 21.6%, American women; [11] 29%, Mestizo women [11] and 9.6%, Warao women; [11] Venezulean women; [12] 36% USA women [13] and south Indian women 10.6%. [14] Another study detected anti-HLA antibodies in only 5% of women with successful pregnancies during the first trimester, compared with an antibody prevalence of 10% in women who miscarried. [15] In a prospective immunization study, Christiansen et al.[16] found higher frequencies of anti-HLA antibodies in women with RM who miscarried (29%) compared with 18% of women who successfully delivered.

Due to variation in immunization and the resultant outcome, a wide variation in the incidence of anti-HLA antibodies in the sera of normal pregnant women have been reported in literature. The values ranged from 7.3% to 36%. [17] It has been reported earlier that 27.8% of RSA women had anti-HLA antibodies from northern India. [18] In our study we have found an incidence of 26.25% anti-HLA antibodies, which suggests that the blocking factors as well as immunity towards the husband's lymphocytes could be different among western Indian RSA couples.

 
   References Top

1.Dausset J. Iso-leuco-anticorps. Acta Haematol 1958;20:156-66.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Payne R, Rolfs MR. Fetomaternal leucocyte incompatibility. J Clin Investig 1958;37:1756-63.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Van Rood JJ, Ernisse JG, Leeuwen A. Leucocyte antibodies in sera from women. Nature 1958;181:1735-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Shankarkumar U, Gupte SC, Gupte SS, Pednaker SV, Ghosh K, Mohanty D. Frequency and potential application of HLA antibodies from pregnant women in Mumbai. J Bio Sci 1998;23:601-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Terasaki PI, McCelland JD. Microdroplet assay of human serum cytotoxins. Nature 1964;204:998-1000.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Komlos L, Zamir R, Joshuah H, Halbrecht I. HL A 0 sharing antipaternal cytotoxic anibodies and MLR blocking factors in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. J Bstet Gyneoco Res 1996;22:177-83.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Beer AE, Quebbman JF, Ayers JW, Haines RF. Major complex antigens, maternal and paternal immune responses and chronic habitual miscarriage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;141:987-99.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Mowbray JF, Gibbings C, Lidell H, Reginals PW, Underwood JL, Beared RW. Controlled trial of treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion by immunization with paternal cells. Lancet 1985;1:941-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Nymand G, Heron I, Jenson G, Lunsgaard A. Occurrence of cytotoxic antibodies during pregnancy. Vox Sang 1971;21:21-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Rodey GE, Anderson J, Aster RH. Acquisition of HLA lymphocytotoxic antibodies: NIAID manual of tissue typing techniques. NIH Publications 1979;80:545.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Decary F, van Helden-Henningheim L, van Griethuysen D, Helmerhorst FM, van der Werf AJ, Engelfriet CP. Detection of B-cell specific alloantibodies in pregnancy sera in the lymphocytotoxicity and the indirect immunofluorescence techniques. Tissue Antigens 1979;14:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Simonney N, Layrisse Z, Balbas O, García E, Stoikow Z. Cytotoxic antibodies in sera of Venezulean multiparous women of Amerindian and mixed ethnic origin. Tissue Antigens 1987;23:117-26.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Terasaki PI, Mickey MR, Yamosaki JN, Vredevoc DL. Maternal fetal incompatibility. Transplant 1970;9:538-43.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Pitchappan RM, Amutha S, Mahendran V, Brahmajothi V, Shankarkumar U, Balakrishnan K, et al. Frequency of HLA antibodies in South India. J Biosc 1993;18:337-80.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Regan L, Braude PR, Hill DP. A prospective study of the incidence, time of appearance and significance of anti-paternal lymphocytotoxic antibodies in human pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1991;6:294-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
16.Chistiansen OB, Pederson B, Mathseian O, Husth M, Grunnet N. Maternal HLA class II alleles predispose to pregnancy losses in Danish women with recurrent spontaneous abortion and their female relatives. Am J Reprid Immunol 1996;35:239-44.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Shankarkumar U, Ghosh K, Gupte SS, Gupte SC, Mohanty D. Role of HLA antigens in Rh (D) alloimmunised pregnant women from Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. J Biosci 2001;27:135-41.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Kishore R, Agrawal S, Hailder A, Das V, Shukla BR, Agarwal SS. HLA sharing, anti-paternal cytotoxic antibodies and MLR blocking factors in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. J Obest Gynecol Res 1996;22:177-83.  Back to cited text no. 18
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]


This article has been cited by
1 An Immunological Basis for Chronic Histiocytic Intervillositis in Recurrent Fetal Loss
Averil D. Reus,Nicole M. van Besouw,Nikki M. Molenaar,Eric A.P. Steegers,Willy Visser,Ronella P. de Kuiper,Ronald R. de Krijger,Dave L. Roelen,Niek Exalto
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2013; 70(3): 230
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Beneficial or Harmful Effect of Antipaternal Human Leukocyte Antibodies on Pregnancy Outcome? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Eileen E.L.O. Lashley,Tess Meuleman,Frans H.J. Claas
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2013; 70(2): 87
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Beneficial or harmful effect of antipaternal human leukocyte antibodies on pregnancy outcome? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Lashley, E.E.L.O. and Meuleman, T. and Claas, F.H.J.
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2013; 70(2): 87-103
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
             

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (485 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Result
    Discussion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2313    
    Printed164    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded155    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal