|Year : 2010 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 124-128
Relationship between seminal plasma zinc and semen quality in a subfertile population
DMAB Dissanayake1, PS Wijesinghe1, WD Ratnasooriya2, S Wimalasena3
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka
2 Department of Zoology, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka
3 Department of Chemistry, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka
|Date of Submission||02-Feb-2010|
|Date of Decision||09-Jul-2010|
|Date of Acceptance||13-Nov-2010|
|Date of Web Publication||23-Dec-2010|
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya
| Abstract|| |
Rationale : Current knowledge on the relationship between seminal zinc levels and different parameters of human semen is inconsistent. Objectives : To assess the relationship between seminal plasma zinc and semen quality using two markers; zinc concentration (Zn-C) and total zinc per ejaculate (Zn-T). Design : The study was carried out as a cross-sectional study. Subjects and Methods : Semen parameters of 152 healthy men undergoing evaluation for subfertility were assessed. Seminal plasma zinc levels were determined using flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Zn-C, expressed as μg/mL, was multiplied by ejaculated volume to calculate Zn-T. Mann Whitney U test and Chi-square test were used to compare the zinc levels between different seminal groups when appropriate. Correlations were observed with Pearson's correlation of coefficient. Analysis was carried out using SPSS 10.0 for windows software. Results : Zn-C was low in 23 (15%) samples, while in 32 (21%) of the samples Zn-T was abnormal. The number of subnormal samples was high in the low-zinc groups compared with the normal-zinc groups, 15 vs. 8 (P > 0.05) for Zn-C and 28 vs. 4 (P < 0.001) for Zn-T. Zn-C was significantly high in the asthenozoospermics compared with the normal motile group; 138.11 μg/mL (83.92) vs. 110.69 11 μg/mL (54.59) (P < 0.05). Zn-T was significantly low in samples with hyperviscosity compared with samples with normal viscosity; 220.06 μg (144.09) vs. 336.34 μg (236.33) (P < 0.05). Conversely, Zn-T was high in samples with low viability compared with those with normal viability; 437.67 μg (283.88) vs. 305.15 μg (221.19) (P < 0.05). Weak correlations were found between Zn and some semen parameters. However, the correlation was negative between pH and Zn-C (r = -0.193, P < 0.05) as well as Zn-T (r = -0.280, P < 0.01). On the other hand, correlations were positive between Zn-T and sperm count (r = 0.211, P < 0.05). Conclusion : Count, motility, viability, pH and viscosity are affected by variations of seminal plasma zinc. Seminal plasma Zn-T is the better marker for assessing the relationship between zinc and semen quality.
Keywords: Semen parameters, subfertility, zinc
|How to cite this article:|
Dissanayake D, Wijesinghe P S, Ratnasooriya W D, Wimalasena S. Relationship between seminal plasma zinc and semen quality in a subfertile population. J Hum Reprod Sci 2010;3:124-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Dissanayake D, Wijesinghe P S, Ratnasooriya W D, Wimalasena S. Relationship between seminal plasma zinc and semen quality in a subfertile population. J Hum Reprod Sci [serial online] 2010 [cited 2013 May 25];3:124-8. Available from: http://www.jhrsonline.org/text.asp?2010/3/3/124/74153
| Introduction|| |
The adult human body contains 1-3 g of zinc, about 0.1% of which is replenished daily.  Excessively high amounts of zinc has been reported in human seminal plasma by many authors, the mean ranges from 78.9 to 274.6 mg/L. ,,,,,, The major contributor of seminal plasma zinc is the prostate gland. , This high concentration of prostatic zinc ions comes into contact with sperm after their functional maturation. On the other hand, the seminal zinc ions get diluted by the vaginal and cervical fluids immediately after ejaculation. Therefore, it is not clear as to how this high zinc level in seminal plasma affects the sperm function. However, its protective role as an antioxidant and as an antibacterial agent is well documented. , It also provides a protective role against heavy metal accumulation (Pb) mediated by competition between them or due to the reduction of available binding sites. 
Although some beneficial effects of zinc on semen have been accepted, controversies continue regarding zinc levels between different subfertile groups as well as the relationship between zinc and semen parameters. Some authors reported significantly different seminal zinc levels between fertile and subfertile groups, indicating low seminal zinc levels in the subfertile populations, , while some others have shown that there is no difference between the two groups. ,,
Attempts have been made over the years in relating seminal zinc levels with semen parameters, but so far the results are inconclusive. Chia et al., reported a significant relationship of seminal plasma zinc with sperm density, motility and viability.  Similar studies have shown the relationships with volume,  pH,  concentration  and morphology.  Lack of relationships is also evident in some other studies. ,, Hence, there is no consensus on determination of the seminal plasma zinc levels in relation to semen quality or prostate function.
The objective of the present study was to determine the seminal plasma zinc levels in a subfertile population and to find the relationship between zinc and semen parameters using two markers; zinc concentration (Zn-C) and total zinc (Zn-T) in the ejaculate.
| Subjects and Methods|| |
Men who were referred for semen analysis at the university-based subfertility clinic were recruited for the study after obtaining informed consent. 330 males were interviewed and 152 were selected. Males with a history of STI, testicular injury, mumps-related orchitis, diabetes mellitus, small testicles (<10mL), varicocele, heavy or regular use of alcohol or smoking, reproductive endocrine abnormalities and fever within the past 3 months were excluded. Ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the ethics committee of the institute.
Men were instructed to collect semen samples by masturbation after 3 days of sexual abstinence. Samples were allowed to liquify at 37°C for 30 mins and analyzed for descriptive semen parameters within 1 h of collection. Analysis was performed according to the WHO guidelines of 1999.  Immediately after assessing the volume, a portion of the sample was centrifuged at 5000g for 10 mins and the supernatant was stored at -20°C for determining the zinc levels. A second sample was obtained from pathozoospermics within 2 weeks of production of the first sample and was analyzed. Of the two samples, a sample with better Functional Motile Sperm Count (FMSC) was included in the study. FMSC was calculated by subtracting the total number of immotile sperm from the total sperm count.
Determination of zinc
All glassware and plasticware were rinsed with 10% nitric acid overnight and thoroughly washed with deionized distilled water before use. Zn-C in seminal plasma was determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (GBC 932 AAS, JOEL Electronics, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). One milliliter of seminal plasma was digested overnight in 2 ml of concentrated nitric acid and 2 mL of perchloric acid. The supernatant was diluted 150-times with deionized water. Samples were run in the range of 0.5-1.5 ppm. Zn-C obtained was multiplied by ejaculate volume to calculate Zn-T. Intra and interassay coefficient of variation were 4.0 and 6.5%, respectively. WHO guidelines consider a Zn-T of <2.4 μmol (153 μg) in the human ejaculate as abnormal, and a cut-off value of <58.5 μg/mL for Zn-C was used in this study.
Data analysis was performed using SPSS 10.0 for windows computer program. Mann Whitney U test and Chi-square test were used to compare the zinc levels between different seminal groups when appropriate. Correlations between numeric data were measured with Pearson's correlation of coefficient. Statistical significance level was considered at P<0.05.
| Results|| |
Mean (SD) age of the study population was 33.43 years (5.1) and duration of subfertility was 39.09 months (33.62). The results of the basic semen analysis are summarized in [Table 1].
|Table 1 :Characteristics of semen samples of the study population (n = 152)|
Click here to view
The mean (SD) Zn-C and mean Zn-T in the ejaculate were 121.87 μg/mL (69.13) and 317.98 μg (227.92), respectively. Low zinc levels were found in 23 (15%) samples when Zn-C was used as the marker while the number of abnormal samples increased to 32 (21%) when Zn-T was used as the marker. The number of pathozoospermic samples was high in the low-zinc groups compared with the normal-zinc groups, irrespective of the marker used; 15 vs. 8 (P > 0.05) when Zn-C was used as the marker and 28 vs. 4 (P < 0.001) when Zn-T was used as the marker.
Seminal plasma Zn-C between the normal and the subnormal semen parameters [Table 2] showed that the mean Zn-C is significantly high in the low-motile group (asthenozoospermics) compared with the group with normal motility; 138.11 μg/mL (83.92) vs. 110.69 11 μg/mL (54.59) (P < 0.05). In contrast, Zn-C was not significantly different between the normal and the subnormal groups in relation to volume, pH, count, viability and morphology.
|Table 2 :Seminal plasma zinc levels between normal and subnormal semen parameters, mean (SD), n = 152 |
Click here to view
Zn-T was significantly low in samples with hyperviscosity compared with samples with normal viscosity; 220.06 μg (144.09) vs. 336.34 μg (236.33) (P < 0.05). Conversely, a significantly high Zn-T value was found in the low-viability group compared with the normal-viability group; 437.67 μg (283.88) vs. 305.15 μg (221.19) (P < 0.05) [Table 3].
|Table 3 :Pearson's coefficient of correlations (r-values) for relationship between zinc levels and semen parameters (n = 152)|
Click here to view
A weak negative correlation (r = -0.193, P < 0.05) was found between Zn-C and semen pH. There were no correlations between Zn-C and any other semen parameters.
The correlation between Zn-T and semen pH was also inverse (r = -0.280, P < 0.01). On the other hand, a positive weak correlation was found between Zn-T and sperm count (r = 0.211, P < 0.05).
| Discussion|| |
The mean seminal plasma Zn-C in our study population (121 μg/mL) is comparable with some similar studies elsewhere in the world, e.g. Lewis Jones et al., (118 μg/mL),  Wong et al., (97.5 μg /mL)  and Kruse et al., (123 μg /mL).  However, the reported zinc levels in a few studies are considerably higher than that of our study; Omu et al., (170.6 μg/mL),  Umeyama et al., (171.1 μg/mL),  Omu et al., (171.1 μg/mL),  Chia et al., (183.6 μg/mL),  while lower levels were reported by Wong et al., (91.1 μg/mL),  and Tikkiwal et al., (78.9 μg/mL). 
Our results show that pathozoospermia is associated with low-seminal plasma zinc levels. Several factors are associated with seminal zinc deficiency. Inflammatory conditions considerably influence the secretory function of the prostate.  This may result in an impaired turnover and decreased secretion of zinc. Accumulation of toxic heavy metals in the testicular tissues may reduce the zinc levels in semen. , On the other hand, a low Zn/Cd ratio decreases the immune response of the semen or testis.  Many investigators have demonstrated that chronic prostatitis is associated with a drop in the zinc content in prostatic fluid.  Frequent ejaculation is another possible factor that can reduce the seminal plasma zinc levels. Seminal plasma zinc declines with zinc depletion. Severe zinc depletion causes a 50% decrease in the amount of zinc per ejaculate.  The low-zinc content of semen may affect the semen quality in different ways. Some mechanisms are reduced antioxidant capacity  and counteracting the effects of other heavy metals. 
We observed significantly different zinc levels between the normal and the subnormal groups in relation to viscosity, motility and viability. However, most of those were found with Zn-T and not with Zn-C. The only variation found with Zn-C was significantly high zinc levels in the asthenozoospermic group. This is consistent with the results of Fujiuchi et al.,  Mendoza et al.,  and Carpino et al.  This could be a reflection of elevated free zinc fraction due to incomplete post-ejaculatory redistribution of the zinc from the prostatic secretions (free and zinc-citrate complex) to higher affinity vesicular ligands. Zinc bound to high-molecular weight proteins (HMW-Zn%) is decreased in asthenozoospermic subjects, resulting in an increase in the free zinc in the seminal plasma. Impairment of motility in these samples may be due to interference by zinc ions on plasma membrane permeability and subsequent uptake by spermatozoa and interference in metabolic processes in sperm.  Using the results obtained by computer-assessed semen analysis (CASA), Sorensen et al., suggested that high seminal Zn-C has only a suppressing effect on progressive motility of spermatozoa (quality of movement) but not on percentage of motile spermatozoa (quantity of movement)  However, we observed comparable levels of Zn-T levels between the two above groups. Validity of measuring total seminal zinc (free and bound to vesicular HMW proteins) is questioned by Carpino et al.  They propose that HMW-Zn% has a better discriminating value among males with normal or low sperm motility.
Viscosity and viability are affected by variations of Zn-T. Lower Zn-T levels in hyperviscous samples are indicative of low-prostatic secretion, which contains prostate-specific antigen. On the other hand, zinc levels were high in the abnormal viability group, indicating the toxic effect of high-zinc levels on sperm vitality.
Available data on the correlation of zinc with semen parameters is also inconclusive. Positive correlations between seminal Zn-C have been reported with sperm concentration and motility,  with sperm density, motility and viability,  with sperm count  and duration of abstinence,  with sperm count of males with normal count but not in oligospermic males.  Some other authors have shown that there is no correlation between the total amount of zinc or Zn-C and semen characteristics. ,,
In this study, Zn-C showed a weak inverse correlation with pH. There was a weak positive correlation between Zn-T and count; in contrast, there was an inverse correlation with pH. Seminal zinc levels seem to reflect the spermatogenic activity of the testis, as shown by a positive correlation between sperm count and Zn-T. The number of germinal cells and sperms are reported to reduce in the testes of zinc-deficient rats. This is partly due to the low activity of angiotensin-converting enzyme, a zinc metallo enzyme that is important in sexual development (maturation of testis) and fertility in males of many species. 
Increased levels of zinc in seminal plasma cause an increase in the intraspermatozoal zinc levels. As the correlation between zinc and pH is negative, we propose that intracellular pH may reduce with an increase in the seminal plasma zinc. The pH depression causes a reduction of respiration, motility and acrosome reaction (AR)  of the spermatozoa. This may have some advantage for the spermatozoa to stay in a relatively inactive state until activated in the female reproductive tract as diluted in the vaginal fluid. Furthermore, the fusion of prostasomes and spermatozoa is pH and protein dependent. Usually, the fusion has been investigated with the pH levels below eight and fusion increases with lowering pH. These prostasomes contain many small ions (Ca 2+ , Zn 2+ , GDP, ADP and ATP) and a number of enzymes. The fusion is helpful to transfer a number of molecules into spermatozoa, modifying the sperm membrane lipoprotein pattern and regulating some important functions (motility, AR) of the spermatozoa. ,
Our results clearly indicated that there is a relationship between zinc and semen quality. However, further studies are needed in our population to observe whether supplementation improves the semen quality in males with subnormal zinc levels or subnormal semen parameters. Such studies will be useful in deciding the necessity of assessing seminal plasma zinc levels in the evaluation of male subfertility.
| Conclusion|| |
According to the results, the andrological variables sensitive to seminal plasma zinc variations are motility, count, viability, pH and viscosity. High Zn-C showed a negative effect on motility and elevated Zn-T negatively affected the viability. There was a positive relationship between Zn-T and total sperm count. Seminal plasma Zn-T appears to be the better marker for assessing the relationship between zinc and semen quality compared with Zn-C.
| Acknowledgment|| |
Financial assistance by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. RG/2004/M/14) is acknowledged.
| References|| |
|1.||Maret W, Sandstead HH. Zinc requirements and the risks and benefits of zinc supplementation. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2006;20:3-18. |
|2.||Chia SE, Ong CN, Chua LH, Ho LM, Tay KS. Comparison of Zinc concentrations in blood and seminal plasma and the various sperm parameters between fertile and infertile men. J Androl 2000;21:53-7. |
|3.||Lewis-Jones DI, Aird IA, Biljan MM, Kingsland CR. Effects of sperm activity on zinc and fructose concentrations in seminal plasma. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2465-7. |
|4.||Tikkiwal M, Ajmera RL, Mathur NK. Effect of zinc administration on seminal zinc and fertility of oligospermic males. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1986;31:30-4. |
|5.||Umeyama T, Ishikawa H, Takeshima H, Yoshii S, Koiso K. A comparative study of seminal trace elements in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril 1986;46:494-9. |
|6.||Omu EA, Fernandes S. The relationship between zinc/cadmium ratio in human semen: Effect on immune response. Kuwait Med J 2001;33:38-43. |
|7.||Kruse WE, Zwick EM, Batschulat K, Rohr G, Ambruster FP, Petzoldt D, et al. Are zinc levels in seminal plasma associated with seminal leucocytes and other determinants of semen quality? Fertil Steril 2002;77:260-9. |
|8.||Carpino A, Siciliano C, Petrore MF, Stefano CD, Aquila SA, Anod S. Low seminal zinc bound to high molecular eight proteins in asthenozoospermic patients; evidence of increased sperm zinc contact in oligoasthenozoospermic patients. Hum Reprod 1998;13:111-4. |
|9.||Sanada S, Yoshida O. Zinc concentrations and total amount of zinc in seminal plasma of infertile men with specific reference to prostatic secretory function. Hinyokika Kiyo 1985;31:1971-87. |
|10.||Wong WY, Mercus MW, Thomas CM, Menkweldr R, Zielhui GA, Theunissen PM. Effect of folic acid and zinc sulfate on male factor subfertility; a double blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2002;77:491-8. |
|11.||Prasad AS, Bao B, Beck FW, Kucuk O, Sarkar FH. Antioxidant effect of zinc in humans. Free Radic Biol Med 2004;37:1182-90. |
|12.||Batra N, Nehru B, Bansal MP. Influence of lead and zinc on rat male reproduction at biochemical and histopathological levels. J Appl Toxicol 2001;21:507-12. |
|13.||Ebisch MW, Pierik FH, Jong FH, Thomas CM, Theunissen RP. Does folic acid and zinc sulphate intervention affect endocrine parameters and sperm characteristics in men. Int J Androl 2006;29:339-45. |
|14.||Henkel R, Baldauf C, Schill WB. Resorption of elemental zinc from spermatozoa by the epididymal epithelium. Reprod Domest Anim 2003;38:97-101. |
|15.||Meeker JD, Rossano MG, Protas B, Diamond MP, Puscheck E, Daly D, et al. Cadmium, lead and other metals in relation to semen quality: Human evidence for molybdenum as a male reproductive toxicant. Environ Health Perspect 2008;116:1473-9. |
|16.||Wong WY, Flik G, Groenen PM, Swinkels DW, Thomas CM, Copius-Peereboom JH, et al. The impact of calcium, magnesium, zinc and copper in blood and seminal plasma on semen parameters in men. Reprod Toxicol 2001;15:131-6. |
|17.||Lin YC, Chang TC, Tseng YJ, Lin YL, Huang FL, Kung FT, et al. Seminal plasma zinc levels and sperm motion characteristics in infertile samples. Channggeng Yi Xue Za Zhi 2000;23:260-6. |
|18.||Colagar AH, Marzony ET, Chaichi MJ. Zinc levels in seminal plasma are associated with sperm quality in fertile and infertile men. Nutr Res 2009;29:82-8. |
|19.||Papadimas J, Bontis J, Ikkos D, Manta LS. Seminal plasma zinc and magnesium in infertile men. Arch Androl 1983;10:261-8. |
|20.||World Health Organization. Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 4 th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. |
|21.||Wong WY, Thomas CM, Merkus JM, Zielhuis GA, Steegers TR. Male factor subfertility: Possible causes and the impact of nutritional factors. Fertil Steril 2000;73:435-42. |
|22.||Omu AE, Dashti H, Al-Othman S. Treatment of asthenozoospermia with zinc sulphate: Andrological, immunological and obstetrics outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 1998;79:179-84. |
|23.||Akinloye O, Arowojolu AO. Cadmium toxicity: A possible cause of male infertility in Nigeria. Reprod Biol 2006;6:17-30. |
|24.||King JC, Shames DM, Woodhouse LR. Zinc homeostasis in humans. J Nutr 2000;130:1360S-6S. |
|25.||Fuse H, Kazama T, Ohta S, Fujiuchi Y. Relationship between zinc concentrations in seminal plasma and various semen parameters. Int Urol Nephrol 1999;31:401-8. |
|26.||Carreas A, Mendoza C. Zinc levels in seminal plasma of fertile and infertile men. Andrologia 1990;23:279-83. |
|27.||Sornsen MB, Bergdhal IA, Hjollund NH, Bonde JP, Stoltenberg M, Ernst E. Zinc magnesium and calcium in human seminal fluid: Relations to other semen parameters and fertility. Hum Reprod 1999;5:331-7. |
|28.||Liu DY, Sie BS, Liu ML, Agresta F, Baker HG. Relationship between seminal plasma zinc concentration and spermatozoa-zona pellucida binding and the ZP induced acrosome reaction in subfertile men. Asian J Androl 2009;11:499-507. |
|29.||Madding CI, Jacob M, Ramsay VP, Sokol RZ. Serum and semen zinc levels in normozoospermic and oligozoospermic men. Ann Nutr Metab 1986;30:213-8. |
|30.||Stallard L, Reeves PG. Zinc deficiency in adult rats reduces the relative abundance of testis-specific angiotensin-converting enzyme mRNA. J Nutr 1997;127:25-9. |
|31.||Clapper DL, Davis JA, Lamothe PJ, Patton C, Epel D. Involvement of zinc in the regulation of pHi, motility, and acrosome reactions in Sea Urchin sperm. J Cell Biol 1985;100:1817-24. |
|32.||Arienti G, Carlini E, Saccardi C, Palmerini CA. Role of human prostasomes in the activation of spermatozoa. J Cell Mol Med 2004;8:77-84. |
|33.||Vivacqua A, Siciliano L, Sabato M, Palma A, Carpino A. Prosrasomes as zinc ligands in human seminal plasma. Int J Androl 2004;27:27-31. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Not only seminal plasma zinc but also other trace elements affect semen quality
| ||Wiwanitkit, V. |
| ||Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2011; 4(1): 58 |