Journal of Human Reproductive Science
Home Ahead of Print Current Issue Archives
   Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size    Users online: 164


 
LETTER TO EDITOR Table of Contents   
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 52
 

Cellular phone and germ cell: A comment


Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok - 10330, Thailand

Date of Web Publication10-May-2010

Correspondence Address:
Viroj Wiwanitkit
Wiwanitkit House, Bangkhae, Bangkok - 10160
Thailand
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.63126

Rights and Permissions

 



How to cite this article:
Wiwanitkit V. Cellular phone and germ cell: A comment. J Hum Reprod Sci 2010;3:52

How to cite this URL:
Wiwanitkit V. Cellular phone and germ cell: A comment. J Hum Reprod Sci [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Sep 17];3:52. Available from: http://www.jhrsonline.org/text.asp?2010/3/1/52/63126


Sir,

The cellular phone is a widely used tool at present. The interesting question is whether cellular phone has any effects on germ cell. Basically, the effect of cellular phone on health is believed to due to microwave emitted from the phone. The effect of microwave from cellular phone on germ cell is a controversial issue. [1],[2] The topic on health effect of cellular phone is of present interest. [3] Rφφsli et al. recommended that "a precautionary approach when dealing with radio and microwave frequency radiation is recommended for the individual and the general population." [4] In this short paper, the author hereby briefly summarizes and comments on the recent reports on the effect of cellular phone on germ cell.

Focusing on the effect of cellular phone on ovary, according to the literature search, there is only one experimental report on this topic published by Gul et al. [1] They reached the conclusion that "microwaves of mobile phones might decrease the number of follicles in rats by several known and, no doubt, countless unknown mechanisms." [1] There are some important considerations on the results of this work. First, this work had no matched control group and uses few numbers of subjects that might lead to some statistical unreliability. Second, the problem of preanalytical interference can be expected. It should be noted that the author did not monitor the background environmental microwave from external sources in the setting and also did not monitor this during the experiment. Third, whether they detected decreased number of the follicle is a physiological change of the rat during its estrous cycle is not well proved.

Focusing on the effect of cellular phone on testes, there are many reports on the effect of cellular phone on testicular cell. Effect of cellular phone on mammalian cells and sperm DNA as well as its effect on apoptosis is still controversial. [5] In an experimental study, microwaves emitted from a cell phone did not affect the testes of the studied rats. [2] However, similar criticisms on this kind of experiment as earlier discussed should be noted. For human model, Hardell et al. reported on null correlation between exposure to cellular phone and testicular cancer in their case control study. [6] However, there are many recent reports on in vitro studies pointing to the possible effect of cellular phone on human spermatozoa. [7],[8],[9],[10] De Iuliis et al. reported that radiation from cellular phone might induce reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. [7] Agarwal et al. also observed similar findings in their in vitro study and proposed that "keeping the cell phone in a trouser pocket in talk mode may negatively affect spermatozoa and impair male fertility." [8] A decrease in the percentage of sperm cells in vital progressing motility in the semen relating to frequency of using mobile phones was also reported by Wdowiak et al. [9] However, these in vitro studies usually depend on small number of tested samples. This makes the limited implication of the results.

In conclusion, effect of cellular phone on the germ cell is still a myth. The previous reports usually pose some problems implying the need for further well-controlled studies for clarification on this topic.

 
   References Top

1.Gul A, Ηelebi H, Uπraώ S. The effects of microwave emitted by cellular phones on ovarian follicles in rats. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;5:729- 33.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Dasdag S, Zulkuf Akdag M, Aksen F, Yilmaz F, Bashan M, Mutlu Dasdag M, et al. Whole body exposure of rats to microwaves emitted from a cell phone does not affect the testes. Bioelectromagnetics 2003;24:182-8.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Sneiderman CA, Ackerman MJ. Cellular radio telecommunication for health care: Benefits and risks. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:479-81.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Rφφsli M, Rapp R, Braun-Fahrlδnder C. Radio and microwave frequency radiation and health-An analysis of the literature. Gesundheitswesen 2003;65:378-92.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Desai NR, Kesari KK, Agarwal A. Pathophysiology of cell phone radiation: Oxidative stress and carcinogenesis with focus on male reproductive system. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2009;7:114.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Hardell L, Carlberg M, Ohlson CG, Westberg H, Eriksson M, Hansson Mild K. Use of cellular and cordless telephones and risk of testicular cancer. Int J Androl 2007;30:115-22.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.De Iuliis GN, Newey RJ, King BV, Aitken RJ. Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One 2009;4: E6446.  Back to cited text no. 7      
8.Agarwal A, Desai NR, Makker K, Varghese A, Mouradi R, Sabanegh E, et al. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: An in vitro pilot study. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1318-25.  Back to cited text no. 8      
9.Wdowiak A, Wdowiak L, Wiktor H. Evaluation of the effect of using mobile phones on male fertility. Ann Agric Environ Med 2007;14:169-72.  Back to cited text no. 9      
10.Deepinder F, Makker K, Agarwal A. Cell phones and male infertility: Dissecting the relationship. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;15:266-70.  Back to cited text no. 10      



This article has been cited by
1 Mobile phone radiofrequency radiation, is it really bad? Is there any evidence?
Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 The role of scientific advisory bodies in precaution-based risk governance illustrated with the issue of uncertain health effects of electromagnetic fields
Harrie F.G. van Dijk,Eric van Rongen,Gilbert Eggermont,Erik Lebret,Wiebe E. Bijker,DaniŽlle R.M. Timmermans
Journal of Risk Research. 2011; 14(4): 451
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 The role of scientific advisory bodies in precaution-based risk governance illustrated with the issue of uncertain health effects of electromagnetic fields
Van Dijk, H.F.G., Van Rongen, E., Eggermont, G., Lebret, E., Bijker, W.E., Timmermans, D.R.M.
Journal of Risk Research. 2011; 14(4): 451-466
[Pubmed]
4 Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with sperm DNA damage
Pacey, A.A.
Human Fertility. 2010; 13(4): 189-193
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
                 

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (296 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2168    
    Printed132    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded158    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal